Skip to main content

What Needs to be Said about the Gaza Massacre

Palestine, paestine israel, Egypt, Egypt palestine, gaza, Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi, Mahmoud Abbas, latest news, latest world news

It has been a tumultuous week that has passed. Ever since seeing the soul-crushing news of 61 (SIXTY ONE) Palestinians murdered as they were protesting their rights to be free from the open-air prison of Gaza, I've been sick to my stomach and heartbroken. The blood of my brothers and sisters spilt over the sands of the Gaza Strip ran aplenty as if it were cheap. Men, women, children, journalists, and medical personnel were slaughtered in cold blood with live ammunition from guns fired by Israeli terrorist soldiers hundreds of yards away overlooking the "border".

What did the shameful Western media do about it? CNN claims "dozens die at the border". The NYT published multiple sham propaganda attempts disguised as "opinion pieces" blaming the Palestinians for their deaths, even going as far as to dehumanize them and negate their suffering. Even the BBC had the gall to call them "clashes". "Clashes"?! It was a massacre! Murder in cold blood!  Disgracefully, other stories were instead posted on the front page that don't deserve mention in this post (see for yourself, if you're so inclined) because doing so would lessen the significance of this issue. The Western MSM continues to this day to vilify the Palestinians in any way shape or form. Pukes and vituperators the likes of Thomas Friedman and Shmuel Rosner spout lies and racist talking points to sell papers and minimize Palestinian humanity and suffering.

Through the media, spokespeople, and politicians it has bought with its influence and coin, Israel has shown on multiple occasions its true face: an occupying power that does not seek peace with the occupied. Its supporters have displayed time and time again their true colors as well: vile racism, vituperation, religious extremism based on erroneously interpreted religious texts, and flat-out nationalism, supremacism, and fascism. Much have called the Palestinians "terrorists", "radicals", and "extremists". Much have dehumanized even the children to the point that their lives are made worthless in the face of Israeli bullets, bombs, grenades, and missiles.

Even worse, the propaganda line that "Hamas soldiers were killed" is not only odiously repetitious, but also plainly false. The interviewee on Palestine Television asked a hypothetical if 50 of the protestors were from Hamas, not stating whether they were from Hamas. Moreover, Yahya Sinwar, one of Hamas's top leaders, stated that the people, not Hamas, gave up armed struggle and in its stead chose peaceful protest. But let's just say that this propaganda point is true: what gives Israel, an occupying power, the right to gun down political opponents? What right does it give them to kill journalists, paramedics, and children? None.

Now, what needs to be said about this? I think there is something on the minds of many people around the world who have condemned time and time again Israel's atrocities against the Palestinian people as well as its policies of wanton destruction based on hate, racism, and apartheid. Is it that "Israel is an apartheid state"? Or... "Israel is a fascist state"? Those words are not enough to convey the truth about the horrors of occupation and genocide. They don't illustrate the dire importance of opposing this longstanding crime against humanity, a crime sanctioned by the hypocritical American imperialist exceptionalism and the puppet leaders who follow suit. No. This is what needs to be said.

Israel is a fascist, apartheid state.


Why? Because, from a historical perspective, the fascists lost. The apartheid supporters lost. And they will, in the face of the brave Palestinian populace. Palestine will be free.




ا الذي يجب قوله عن مذبحة غزة؟

لقد كان أسبوعًا صاخبًا قد مر. منذ رؤية أخبار مقتل 61 شخصًا (سيكس تو وان) التي قُتل فيها الفلسطينيون وهم يحتجون على حقوقهم في التحرر من سجن غزة في الهواء الطلق ، كنت مريضًا في معدتي وفقدان القلب. إن دماء إخوتي وأخواتي التي امتدت على رمال قطاع غزة كانت تنفد كما لو كانت رخيصة. وذُكر رجال ونساء وأطفال وصحفيون وعاملون طبيون بدم بارد بالذخيرة الحية من البنادق التي أطلقها جنود الإرهاب الإسرائيليون على بعد مئات الياردات المطلة على "الحدود".ما الذي فعلته وسائل الإعلام الغربية المشينة حيال ذلك؟ وتزعم شبكة CNN "أن العشرات يموتون على الحدود". نشرت صحيفة نيويورك تايمز العديد من محاولات الدعاية الخفية المقنعة كـ "قطع رأي" تلوم الفلسطينيين على وفاتهم ، بل ذهبت إلى درجة تجريدهم من إنسانيتهم ​​وإبطال معاناتهم. حتى أن هيئة الإذاعة البريطانية (BBC) كانت تمتلك المرارة لتطلق عليها "صدامات". "اشتباكات" ؟! لقد كانت مجزرة! القتل بدم بارد! بشكل خزي ، تم نشر قصص أخرى بدلاً من ذلك على الصفحة الأولى التي لا تستحق الذكر في هذا المنشور (انظر بنفسك ، إذا كنت تميل إلى ذلك) لأن القيام بذلك يقلل من أهمية هذه المسألة. ويستمر سوق مسقط للأوراق المالية الغربي حتى يومنا هذا في تشويه صورة الفلسطينيين بأي شكل أو شكل. فالمدافعون والناشطون هم أمثال توماس فريدمان وشمويل روزنر يوقعون ويكشفون عن نقاط عنصرية لبيع الصحف والتقليل من الإنسانية الفلسطينية والمعاناة.


من خلال وسائل الإعلام والمتحدثين والسياسيين الذين اشترتهم من خلال نفوذها وعمالتها ، أظهرت إسرائيل في مناسبات عديدة وجهها الحقيقي: قوة محتلة لا تسعى للسلام مع المحتل. لقد عرض مؤيدوها مرارًا وتكرارًا ألوانهم الحقيقية أيضًا: العنصرية الدنيئة ، والتطرف ، والتطرف الديني المستند إلى النصوص الدينية التي تم تفسيرها عن طريق الخطأ ، والقومية المستبدة ، والتفوق ، والفاشية. لقد أطلق الكثير على الفلسطينيين اسم "الإرهابيين" و "المتطرفين" و "المتطرفين". لقد جرد الكثير من الناس حتى الأطفال لدرجة أن حياتهم أصبحت عديمة القيمة في مواجهة الرصاص الإسرائيلي والقنابل والقنابل اليدوية والصواريخ.والأسوأ من ذلك ، أن خط الدعاية الذي يقول إن "مقتل جنود حماس" ليس تكرارًا بغيضًا فحسب ، بل كاذبًا أيضًا. سأل المقابلة في التلفزيون الفلسطيني افتراضية إذا كان 50 من المتظاهرين من حماس ، ولم يذكروا ما إذا كانوا من حماس. علاوة على ذلك ، صرح يحيى سينوار ، أحد كبار قادة حماس ، بأن الناس ، وليس حماس ، تخلوا عن الكفاح المسلح ، وبدلاً من ذلك اختاروا الاحتجاج السلمي. لكن دعنا نقول فقط إن هذه النقطة الدعائية صحيحة: ما الذي يمنح إسرائيل ، قوة احتلال ، الحق في قتل المعارضين السياسيين؟ ما هو الحق الذي يعطيهم لقتل الصحفيين والمساعدين الطبيين والأطفال؟ لا شيء.

الآن ، ما الذي يجب قوله عن هذا؟ أعتقد أن هناك شيئًا في أذهان كثير من الناس حول العالم الذين أدانوا مرارا وتكرارا الفظائع الإسرائيلية ضد الشعب الفلسطيني وسياساته من التدمير العشوائي القائم على الكراهية والعنصرية والفصل العنصري. هل هي "إسرائيل دولة أبرتهايد"؟ أو ... "إسرائيل دولة فاشية"؟ هذه الكلمات ليست كافية لنقل الحقيقة عن أهوال الاحتلال والإبادة الجماعية. إنها لا توضح الأهمية البالغة لمعارضة هذه الجريمة العنيفة ضد الإنسانية ، وهي جريمة يعاقب عليها الاستثناء الإمبريالي الأمريكي المنافق وقادة الدمى الذين يتبعونهم. لا. هذا ما يجب قوله.

إسرائيل دولة فاشية وأبارتهايد.

لماذا ا؟ لأنه ، من منظور تاريخي ، خسر الفاشيون. خسر أنصار الفصل العنصري. وسوف يواجهون ، في مواجهة الشعب الفلسطيني الشجاع. فلسطين سوف تكون حرة








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Politics as an "Outflow of Culture": Unmasking Racism in today's Socioeconomic Scene

A common yet grave fallacy is to assume that (the actions of) (part of) the infrastructure of a particular country at a particular time and place is derived from a singular cause, of which a metaphysical nature attributed to said cause would be even more so. That said, attributing (a perception of) (failed) politics as an "outflow" of a country's culture is in my honest opinion a crock of bull. I'm not denying that culture and politics are related: there clearly is a relationship between the two in the broader historical context. However, this reductionist outlook panders to more than your garden variety racism, itself being built on misinterpretations and misunderstandings. Why is that? First of all, consider that politics and culture are mutually exclusive concepts, although their definitions may not appear to be so on the surface. Politics (according to the pseudo-omniscient Wikipedia [1] ) is a process by which groups of people make collective decisions. The...

Book Review: "The Third Chimpanzee" by Jared Diamond

Jared Diamond is sort of a rock star in the sphere of biogeography (and science in general depending on your perspective). He is more a doom-sayer than a soothe-sayer, a prophet warning of the destruction of society and mankind as a whole. His magnum opus and prophetic text " Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies" has received accolades from a variety of sources, the least of which was the Pulitzer Prize in 1998. Having read that book myself, I came into his lesser-known essay " The Third Chimpanzee " with the expectation that it would be entertaining and enlightening at the same time. Gladly, I was not disappointed, but a glaring issue exists that I will address later. The first book published by Jared Diamond, " The Third Chimpanzee " explores the progression of human evolution in four parts. In the first, he explores the biological premises of our relationship to two other primate species, the common and pygmy chimpanzees (now c...

On "Leviathan", by Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury (Part 1: On Man)

Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan , or The Matter, Forme, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil,  is a veritable juggernaut (pun intended) of a book. It is Hobbes' magnum opus, having been circulated widely by the turn of the 17th and 18th Centuries at a time when England was plunged into civil war. Rather than rebel against the new political order (a war crime according to Hobbes which I will revisit later in this post), Hobbes' central thesis is to submit to the absolute authority of an established commonwealth (preferably, in Hobbes' point of view, a "Christian" one), which he compares to the overwhelming biblical sea monster, the Leviathan. Having just finished reading it, I would like to convey my thoughts on his central themes in as short a post as allowed by the breadth of the knowledge he passed on with this read. For this post, I will stick to part 1 (On Man), and deal with the subsequent parts of the book in later posts. Summary of P...