Skip to main content

Broadening Perspective: The Search for a Culturally Pluralistic Viewpoint

I admit: I do sound like a "culture-centric" person at times... well, probably most of the time? Most of the issues that I address here on this blog deal with the Middle East and Islam, particularly because I am a Middle Eastern Muslim. Thing is, I don't want my identity to affect my scope of things to the totality of ignoring all other views, news, and beliefs. The world does not revolve around a single point on itself. It spins on an axis, with each part of the world getting its share of the Sun and Moon. While some issues may technically be viewed "hotter" than others, there is no way one can ignore other worldly issues because these issues will, one day, affect us all, and that we can't assume how good or bad the world has become. For example, I tend to base my assertion that the world is a worser place than it was 6 years ago mainly because of what happened in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as the worsening situation for Palestinians living in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. I also have become aware of Islamophobia, and, from my point of view, how it is gaining momentum in the Eastern and Western worlds. These are a handful of facts that I tend to consider when it comes to the issue of how I view the world.

Unfortunately, that's not the way it should be. Some might say the world is a better place, while others might claim that it's not. Being blisfully unaware of the positives and negatives in worldly affairs is dangerous particularly because we tend to think that ignorance will lead us somewhere. This is not true at all: ignorance has lead to fear, hate and bigotry, of which the last-mentioned aspect lacks any sort of rational and even human thought. When one opens a newspaper, he/she would be more concerned regarding the events that are shaping his/her little (bubble?) world, particularly because those affairs of other nations are of no importance. While this may be acceptable to the common person, we have to take into account that indifference towards other human beings is borderline neglection and, at times, racism, or even culture-centric behavior, which is ethnocentric as well.

The fact is that it's just that we are too ingrained in our own cultures and societies to the extent that we can't learn or familiarize ourselves with others, or finding what is going on in other places. What we need is to detach ourselves from the viewpoint that our societies are most important to us (yes, they are important, but for the sake of understanding others and viewing worldly events is something else altogether). To think that our societies are "best" or that they (each one, really) are the only ones that "matter" is like thinking that one part of the world is more important than the other part... okay, but on what basis? We need to view the world in as objective a way as possible, even when it comes to our own societies, which is something I will talk about later.

The issue here is perspective. My perspective is limited to the MidEast. However, it is noted that I should broaden it, the reason particularly being that while other issues do not involve people that I can identify with, these issues still involve people. People matter. When Africa comes to mind, I somehow think of people sufferring from all sorts of ailments, but this is not because they are African. They are in a situation that has been drastically affected by serious pre-WWI and post-war colonialism. However, when I view the continent, I see... people... not just Africans, but people. I see people sufferring the same fate of Palestinians and Iraqis, and both plights have not been addressed in any way deemed necessary. Their sufferring is not greater or less than the sufferring of people elsewhere, but the fact that theirs is also an issue as much as any other issue makes it one that should be addressed.

This is as important as belief in the concept of Humanity (that all humans are equal, and national identities should not be applied as discriminatory measures). There is absolutely no reason to consider one group of people over another politically, and no reason to shun or push aside the issue of sufferring and/or politics aside. Understanding the world delineates bigoted perceptions of "other" cultures and "other" people. Let me help you out a bit. Imagine you came back from a hard day at work and flipped on the news. You see images of death and despair, but you'd probably flip the channel and get to the sports scores if those people who were sufferring were not people you could identify with culturally, religiously, nationally, etc. But say they were. If they were people who you identify with, I bet you wouldn't mind missing on who won last night's Calcio Italia game, right?

Thought so. The idea here is that what could affect these less fortunate "others" are what could affect you and your people in general. Another question, more worthy of thought: What makes "them" less deserving of your attention?

This is why we should seek to understand what affects others, and how one can remove all signs of ignorance. Sure, it might be a waste of time for yourself, or of little concern, but these are people and that's what it comes down to. While I strongly advocate non-aggression, I'm all for understanding and activism when the situation calls for it. This is why the world should not be rent asunder with ignorance. And this, my friends, is my clarion call. I will, from now on, try my best to be as open as possible... to be as culturally pluralistic as possible... and to bring forth my views regarding much of what shapes the world, not just a place that I adhere from.

Salaam, from Saracen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What "Culture Clash"?

I hear this all the time, and yet I still have yet to not only materialistically comprehend this prospect, but to philosophically grasp it. There are so many cultures and races that dot this earth, and yet we have seen them come and go as well. But how can cultures themselves clash? To answer this question, one should take a look at the definition of culture. The word culture , from the Latin colo, -ere, with its root meaning "to cultivate", generally refers to patterns of human activity and the symbolic structures that give such activity significance. Different definitions of "culture" reflect different theoretical bases for understanding, or criteria for evaluating, human activity. Note the definition: patterns of personal activity. Patterns by themselves are immeasurable and also immaterial. However, the only material object encountered in the definition is the set of "symbolic structures" that represent these patterns and give them significance. Cult

حول قرار حماس تشكيل قوة مشتركة من الفصائل

هذا النص يتحدث عن التشقق في الحكومة الفلسطينية, وكيف استغلوا القوات الصهيونية على التفرق بين حماس ومنظمة التخريب " فتح" التي خانت الفاسطينيون لخدمة نفسها ولخدمة "إسراءيل". تأليف د. إبراهيم علوش قرار وزير داخلية السلطة الفلسطينية، القائمة على مرجعية اتفاقية أوسلو، بتشكيل قوة مشتركة من الفصائل العسكرية الفلسطينية المقاومة، وقرار محمود عباس رئيس سلطة أوسلو بشطب قرار وزير الداخلية سعيد صيام بتشكيل تلك القوة المشتركة، أثار الكثير من التكهنات واللغط حول مغزى تلك الخطوة وأبعادها. ومثل كل قرار سياسي، هناك دائماً واجهة خارجية وأجندة خفية، خاصة عندما نتعامل مع قوى قررت أن تكون جزءاً من الواقع السائد بدلاً من الانقلاب عليه. فالانضمام لركب أوسلو، على أساس مشروع "تغييره من الداخل"، يترك المرء بالضرورة أسير مساومات لا يمكن إلا أن تمس بالثوابت وبالمرجعيات التاريخية لصراعنا مع الحركة الصهيونية منذ أكثر من قرن. وبالمقابل، فإن قرار محمود عباس بشطب قرار وزير الداخلية يرتبط بدوره بحسابات التنافس الداخلي، ليس فقط على الصلاحيات، بل على كل دوره التاريخي هو وفتح. المهم، يمكن أن ت

Book Review: "The Crusade through Arab Eyes" by Amin Maalouf

The bulk of modern history regarding the Crusades has an unashamedly Western slant to it. Even a cursory search of the word "crusade" on Amazon Books reveals a plethora of books written by authors from the U.K., the U.S., and elsewhere in the Western world, but a severe (emphasis) paucity of books from a more Arab perspective. One book that stands out is Amin Maalouf's "The Crusades through Arab Eyes", a book I believe is much-needed given the overall bias inherent in the gestalt of Western history books on this topic. The gold standard for history on the Crusades is currently the "The Oxford History of the Crusades", another book I will review in the not-so-distant future (and expect comparisons to this book given that I have completed reading it). The too-long-didn't-read version of this review is the following: if you're interested in history, buy it, read it, and keep it. Nevertheless, my full review follows. For those who are un