Skip to main content

Extremists in Indonesia, "Christians" and "Muslims"

It's a "Java Malfunction"...but I'm not talking about the computer program that is constantly being used by thousands of websites that are trying to deliver their material in as organized and attractive a way as possible, and not even about coffee gone horrible. After watching this disturbing video on YouTube, I opened my eyes more to the supposedly troubled archipelago that we know as Indonesia, the most populous self-proclaimed Muslim nation. Apparently, from the surface, we see nothing but news of fanatics, bombings, murders, hurricanes... things that make your heart cringe or, in the case of the massacres that have been taking place over the past few decades, ache...

But what is plaguing Java and Indonesia in general? Is it religious conflict in the form of Muslim fanatics vs. Christian fanatics? Is it just a case of hate crimes between religious communities? Could it be ethnic strife? Could the corrupt Indonesian government have a hand in this? Or did it simply incite for such a thing to happen? Or did a colonial power (Netherlands) previously incited these divisions during its colonial reign? All I am aware of is that "Muslims" and "Christians", put so bluntly, are "killing each other". Are they? Or is it a case of extremism in both communities that is causing this strife?

Okay, let's slow down for a sec. I apparently asked more questions than I can answer. But the answer to all these questions is the same if we are to investigate this matter. As per the BBC profile on Indonesia,the country itself
has seen great turmoil in recent years, having faced the Asian financial crisis, the fall of President Suharto after 32 years in office, the first free elections since the 1960s, the loss of East Timor, independence demands from restive provinces, bloody ethnic and religious conflict and a devastating tsunami.
East Timor is a largely Christian island that continuously and fiercely demanded independence from the Indonesian archipelago. However, most of the recent violence has not been reported on East Timor, for it has achieved independence in 1999. We can thus cancel out the possibility of East Timor being involved in this mess.

The Indonesian government is known for its bad human rights record, and the government itself is secular. However, as indicative of this article, it seems that each province in Indonesia is independent and can choose its own laws. That leaves out the government... or does it? Well, not according to this article, but the Human Rights Watch 2002 report on violence in Sulawesi, Poso and Maluka (yes, I know this is an old story, but only recently have I found out about this) claims that the Indonesian military was unable to quell the violence between the Muslims and Christians in these areas. Of course, it's crazy to assume that an inefficient military alone is the cause of such violence.

In the same year, however, we had the 2002 Bali bombings, carried out by "Izlamofashist" terrorists of the Jemaah Islamiya, which indicates that they might have been active in the fights between Muslims and Christians. However, as per a poll conducted (I know polls tend to be faulty), the percentage of Muslims who are willing to conduct such attacks is small, and about the same as the proportions of Christians. Therefore, those who actually commit the attacks are most likely in smaller proportions. Therefore, the answer to the above question is "religious" extremism on the part of those who choose to be extreme.

The solution, as mentioned in the article containing the poll, would be to encourage pluralism and tolerance, and denounce and discourage extremist behavior. We haven't heard news of extremist violence in Indonesia ever since, so I guess the measures being taken against such extremism are working.

Salaam, from Saracen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What "Culture Clash"?

I hear this all the time, and yet I still have yet to not only materialistically comprehend this prospect, but to philosophically grasp it. There are so many cultures and races that dot this earth, and yet we have seen them come and go as well. But how can cultures themselves clash? To answer this question, one should take a look at the definition of culture. The word culture , from the Latin colo, -ere, with its root meaning "to cultivate", generally refers to patterns of human activity and the symbolic structures that give such activity significance. Different definitions of "culture" reflect different theoretical bases for understanding, or criteria for evaluating, human activity. Note the definition: patterns of personal activity. Patterns by themselves are immeasurable and also immaterial. However, the only material object encountered in the definition is the set of "symbolic structures" that represent these patterns and give them significance. Cult

حول قرار حماس تشكيل قوة مشتركة من الفصائل

هذا النص يتحدث عن التشقق في الحكومة الفلسطينية, وكيف استغلوا القوات الصهيونية على التفرق بين حماس ومنظمة التخريب " فتح" التي خانت الفاسطينيون لخدمة نفسها ولخدمة "إسراءيل". تأليف د. إبراهيم علوش قرار وزير داخلية السلطة الفلسطينية، القائمة على مرجعية اتفاقية أوسلو، بتشكيل قوة مشتركة من الفصائل العسكرية الفلسطينية المقاومة، وقرار محمود عباس رئيس سلطة أوسلو بشطب قرار وزير الداخلية سعيد صيام بتشكيل تلك القوة المشتركة، أثار الكثير من التكهنات واللغط حول مغزى تلك الخطوة وأبعادها. ومثل كل قرار سياسي، هناك دائماً واجهة خارجية وأجندة خفية، خاصة عندما نتعامل مع قوى قررت أن تكون جزءاً من الواقع السائد بدلاً من الانقلاب عليه. فالانضمام لركب أوسلو، على أساس مشروع "تغييره من الداخل"، يترك المرء بالضرورة أسير مساومات لا يمكن إلا أن تمس بالثوابت وبالمرجعيات التاريخية لصراعنا مع الحركة الصهيونية منذ أكثر من قرن. وبالمقابل، فإن قرار محمود عباس بشطب قرار وزير الداخلية يرتبط بدوره بحسابات التنافس الداخلي، ليس فقط على الصلاحيات، بل على كل دوره التاريخي هو وفتح. المهم، يمكن أن ت

Book Review: "The Crusade through Arab Eyes" by Amin Maalouf

The bulk of modern history regarding the Crusades has an unashamedly Western slant to it. Even a cursory search of the word "crusade" on Amazon Books reveals a plethora of books written by authors from the U.K., the U.S., and elsewhere in the Western world, but a severe (emphasis) paucity of books from a more Arab perspective. One book that stands out is Amin Maalouf's "The Crusades through Arab Eyes", a book I believe is much-needed given the overall bias inherent in the gestalt of Western history books on this topic. The gold standard for history on the Crusades is currently the "The Oxford History of the Crusades", another book I will review in the not-so-distant future (and expect comparisons to this book given that I have completed reading it). The too-long-didn't-read version of this review is the following: if you're interested in history, buy it, read it, and keep it. Nevertheless, my full review follows. For those who are un