Skip to main content

Software Review: Windows Live OneCare... Does it Really Care?

As a regular computer user, I've come across different virus-scanning software programs that helped me keep my computer and my data safe. Among them were McAfee Virusscan 5, Norton AV, Norman AV (I thought they were the same), and McAfee Virus-scan 8 and 10. I thought I was in for the best security protection when Windows Live OneCare came out, and decided to subscribe to its services in order to give it a shot. I was like, "Hey, it's coming from the guys who made Windows, so I'm sure they know whatever hits it and whatnot." Boy, was I proven wrong.

Let's just take a look at what this software really is (1). Overall, it appears to be a copy of McAfee Security Suite, which comes loaded with an anti-virus, a firewall, an anti-spyware module, spamkiller, etc. Windows Live OneCare, however, comes with an anti-virus, anti-spyware, firewall, backup utility, disk cleanup, disk defragmenter, an anti-phishing filter, and... that's about it. The beta version itself was seriously bugged (2). Moreover, it doesn't support Opera and Firefox (not that I use them or anything), and doesn't offer the same amount of reliable protection that McAfee and Norton would, of which the former, in my opinion, is the better (3). Also, as stated before, many of its features, such as automatic updates, backups, anti-spyware, disk defragmentation, disk cleanup, etc. can be found on Windows or downloaded from Microsoft.com (4).

Well, that's what a handful of computer users and reviewers have said about this suite. From my experience, I had McAfee Virus-scan 8.0i w/anti-spyware module, Windows Defender, and Lavasoft Ad-aware 2007. My computer was running fine, and then I decided to buy a year-long subscription of Windows Live OneCare. After installing it, etc., I already noticed that my laptop was slowing down. This was because the engine was not only running real-time on-access virus scanning, but it was also running a spyware scan and a firewall. My computer's performance slowed down considerably, and my Internet Explorer was bugged within a week's time. I updated my definitions almost daily: every time I was working on my university assignments, I made sure to run its update checker. It was annoying and unnerving that I still received such problems.

After four months, I decided to pull the plug on OneCare on my system, and re-initiated my previous security software.

Bottom line: I'll stick to McAfee and whatever else I have for now. I know this might be abrupt of me as my laptop isn't really that high-end yet, and I'm still running Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 2. OneCare doesn't really care about XP for me at least, but I'm pretty sure it would run smoothly on Vista. I hear the same thing can be said for Grisoft's AVG Anti-virus (6). But until I get a new, hopefully high-end, laptop with Windows Vista (Home Premium most likely), I'm shelving OneCare for now. I don't recommend OneCare for PC users who have performance issues.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What "Culture Clash"?

I hear this all the time, and yet I still have yet to not only materialistically comprehend this prospect, but to philosophically grasp it. There are so many cultures and races that dot this earth, and yet we have seen them come and go as well. But how can cultures themselves clash? To answer this question, one should take a look at the definition of culture. The word culture , from the Latin colo, -ere, with its root meaning "to cultivate", generally refers to patterns of human activity and the symbolic structures that give such activity significance. Different definitions of "culture" reflect different theoretical bases for understanding, or criteria for evaluating, human activity. Note the definition: patterns of personal activity. Patterns by themselves are immeasurable and also immaterial. However, the only material object encountered in the definition is the set of "symbolic structures" that represent these patterns and give them significance. Cult

حول قرار حماس تشكيل قوة مشتركة من الفصائل

هذا النص يتحدث عن التشقق في الحكومة الفلسطينية, وكيف استغلوا القوات الصهيونية على التفرق بين حماس ومنظمة التخريب " فتح" التي خانت الفاسطينيون لخدمة نفسها ولخدمة "إسراءيل". تأليف د. إبراهيم علوش قرار وزير داخلية السلطة الفلسطينية، القائمة على مرجعية اتفاقية أوسلو، بتشكيل قوة مشتركة من الفصائل العسكرية الفلسطينية المقاومة، وقرار محمود عباس رئيس سلطة أوسلو بشطب قرار وزير الداخلية سعيد صيام بتشكيل تلك القوة المشتركة، أثار الكثير من التكهنات واللغط حول مغزى تلك الخطوة وأبعادها. ومثل كل قرار سياسي، هناك دائماً واجهة خارجية وأجندة خفية، خاصة عندما نتعامل مع قوى قررت أن تكون جزءاً من الواقع السائد بدلاً من الانقلاب عليه. فالانضمام لركب أوسلو، على أساس مشروع "تغييره من الداخل"، يترك المرء بالضرورة أسير مساومات لا يمكن إلا أن تمس بالثوابت وبالمرجعيات التاريخية لصراعنا مع الحركة الصهيونية منذ أكثر من قرن. وبالمقابل، فإن قرار محمود عباس بشطب قرار وزير الداخلية يرتبط بدوره بحسابات التنافس الداخلي، ليس فقط على الصلاحيات، بل على كل دوره التاريخي هو وفتح. المهم، يمكن أن ت

Book Review: "The Crusade through Arab Eyes" by Amin Maalouf

The bulk of modern history regarding the Crusades has an unashamedly Western slant to it. Even a cursory search of the word "crusade" on Amazon Books reveals a plethora of books written by authors from the U.K., the U.S., and elsewhere in the Western world, but a severe (emphasis) paucity of books from a more Arab perspective. One book that stands out is Amin Maalouf's "The Crusades through Arab Eyes", a book I believe is much-needed given the overall bias inherent in the gestalt of Western history books on this topic. The gold standard for history on the Crusades is currently the "The Oxford History of the Crusades", another book I will review in the not-so-distant future (and expect comparisons to this book given that I have completed reading it). The too-long-didn't-read version of this review is the following: if you're interested in history, buy it, read it, and keep it. Nevertheless, my full review follows. For those who are un