Skip to main content

"A Shoe on Your Head": the Romantic Story of Bush and the 2 Size 10's

I know this story is long overdue, and that I haven't been writing in a while. There are more things to life than sitting in front of a computer and rambling about whatever comes your way in the news or your daily experiences. But anyways, to the issue at hand. Last year on December the 14th, Muntazer al-Zaidi, an Iraqi reporter from the Iraqi-owned and Egyptian-based Al-Baghdadia TV (البغدادية), threw 2 "size 10" shoes (according to Dubya) at the then pResident of the U.S., George W. Bush (1). All Dubya could do was smile at Zaidi, who was then assailed by Iraqi security forces and taken into custody. Of course, that was all said and done at the time, and usually at other events involving political figures being assailed one way or another by angry protestors, the news of such things tends to die off or remain in memory as an event alone.

Of course, that's for most events of this theme.

Sadly, Western - and unfortunately this time around, Arab - media outlets have a tendency to over-romanticize these "bizarre" events as expressions of cultural norms or something that pertains solely to culture, and de-valuing the role of the individual at that point (2, 3, 4). The biggest example is how some media pundits tend to focus more on supposed Islamic misinterpretations as being behind some major terrorist attack as opposed to examining the individual motives behind the attackers and their socio-psychological histories (5).

In this case, the ever-so-present insult of raising the shoe in Arab culture became the headlines on December 15, NOT the notion of an angry journalist throwing a pair at the man who was solely responsible for leaving Iraq in the third-world developmental nightmare that it is in right now. I would have expected to at least see analysts talking about the motives of this man and questioning as to what brought him to do such a thing, not show April 2003 footage of Iraqi mobs slapping the head of a fallen Saddam statue (believe me, I'd love to join them myself, but that's besides the point; 6). This footage has been added to the repository of images and fantasies that is Orientalism, and indeed we see the hand of Orientalism at play here.

What's surprising is the reaction of the Arab world. Protests in Iraq supporting Zaidi involved banners with shoes on top of them (7). They also appeared in protests against the Gaza bombardment (which I will discuss soon) in places as far as Istanbul and London (8). I once saw a Kuwaiti politician on some obscure Arabic channel raise his shoe at Abbas in protest of the latter's unwillingness to help the Gazan populace in this time of need. Even the brand of shoes that were thrown at Bush had their sales skyrocket following the incident.

Still, though, I wouldn't go as far as to say that the shoe will become the new symbol for Pan-Arab nationalism and resistance.

Salaam, from Saracen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What "Culture Clash"?

I hear this all the time, and yet I still have yet to not only materialistically comprehend this prospect, but to philosophically grasp it. There are so many cultures and races that dot this earth, and yet we have seen them come and go as well. But how can cultures themselves clash? To answer this question, one should take a look at the definition of culture. The word culture , from the Latin colo, -ere, with its root meaning "to cultivate", generally refers to patterns of human activity and the symbolic structures that give such activity significance. Different definitions of "culture" reflect different theoretical bases for understanding, or criteria for evaluating, human activity. Note the definition: patterns of personal activity. Patterns by themselves are immeasurable and also immaterial. However, the only material object encountered in the definition is the set of "symbolic structures" that represent these patterns and give them significance. Cult

حول قرار حماس تشكيل قوة مشتركة من الفصائل

هذا النص يتحدث عن التشقق في الحكومة الفلسطينية, وكيف استغلوا القوات الصهيونية على التفرق بين حماس ومنظمة التخريب " فتح" التي خانت الفاسطينيون لخدمة نفسها ولخدمة "إسراءيل". تأليف د. إبراهيم علوش قرار وزير داخلية السلطة الفلسطينية، القائمة على مرجعية اتفاقية أوسلو، بتشكيل قوة مشتركة من الفصائل العسكرية الفلسطينية المقاومة، وقرار محمود عباس رئيس سلطة أوسلو بشطب قرار وزير الداخلية سعيد صيام بتشكيل تلك القوة المشتركة، أثار الكثير من التكهنات واللغط حول مغزى تلك الخطوة وأبعادها. ومثل كل قرار سياسي، هناك دائماً واجهة خارجية وأجندة خفية، خاصة عندما نتعامل مع قوى قررت أن تكون جزءاً من الواقع السائد بدلاً من الانقلاب عليه. فالانضمام لركب أوسلو، على أساس مشروع "تغييره من الداخل"، يترك المرء بالضرورة أسير مساومات لا يمكن إلا أن تمس بالثوابت وبالمرجعيات التاريخية لصراعنا مع الحركة الصهيونية منذ أكثر من قرن. وبالمقابل، فإن قرار محمود عباس بشطب قرار وزير الداخلية يرتبط بدوره بحسابات التنافس الداخلي، ليس فقط على الصلاحيات، بل على كل دوره التاريخي هو وفتح. المهم، يمكن أن ت

Book Review: "The Crusade through Arab Eyes" by Amin Maalouf

The bulk of modern history regarding the Crusades has an unashamedly Western slant to it. Even a cursory search of the word "crusade" on Amazon Books reveals a plethora of books written by authors from the U.K., the U.S., and elsewhere in the Western world, but a severe (emphasis) paucity of books from a more Arab perspective. One book that stands out is Amin Maalouf's "The Crusades through Arab Eyes", a book I believe is much-needed given the overall bias inherent in the gestalt of Western history books on this topic. The gold standard for history on the Crusades is currently the "The Oxford History of the Crusades", another book I will review in the not-so-distant future (and expect comparisons to this book given that I have completed reading it). The too-long-didn't-read version of this review is the following: if you're interested in history, buy it, read it, and keep it. Nevertheless, my full review follows. For those who are un