I remember seeing a particular advertisement on the BBC for the 2008 Presidential Election in the United States, claiming that it would be a vote that would affect issues the world over, "from the war in Iraq to peace in the Middle East". That's the usual caffeinated hyperbole you get from people who nag at you and knock at your door, telling you to "go out and vote!" As if voting is going to change anything? Elections don't build nations (and that's the topic of an upcoming post, I promise you that), but election results are nonetheless important.
To be frank, I was quite surprised that Barack Obama was elected to the Presidency. I bet my brother and a couple of friends that McCain would win, not that I supported that old geyser in the first place. I should have considered that he was committing political suicide by giving his VP candidacy ticket to Sarah Palin, an inexperienced Alaskan governor, all-around "hockey mom", and redneck who just loved to rail constantly against Obama without backing her own stances.
Nor was I particularly interested in Obama, either: politics being politics, I'm not holding anything against for or against him until he actually does something. Regardless, the lesser of two evils will be in the White House starting January 20, 2009. Yes, I know his speech following his victory was moving and tear-jerking to his groupies, but I don't take words. I consider actions. The previous U.S. presidents have railed on the same things over and over again prior to their terms in office.
One of them ended with a stain on the blouse of an intern.
My point is that while I admire Obama's charisma, I will still keep him in the limelight until he actually turns country policy around. The same goes for the Middle East: his policies sound more hawkish than Hillary Clinton (who herself is a disaster of epic proportions). At best, Obama may actually bring stability to the Middle East, but I don't see him as some sort of messianic figure that will help the Middle Eastern people back up on their feet: it would be against American interests to tip over tyrannical governments that serve their interests.
He might not be in any shape or form able to tip the scales of the Israeli-Palestine conflict towards the middle and/or find an equitable solution to both sides. Then again, American intervention is what's making it worse in the first place.
The campaign itself was fraught with the usual immaturity of political bipartisanship and bantering. I wonder if it's going to be any different in the next 4 or 8 years should the Americans re-elect Obama in 2012. Either way, I'm not holding my breath.
Salaam, from Saracen
To be frank, I was quite surprised that Barack Obama was elected to the Presidency. I bet my brother and a couple of friends that McCain would win, not that I supported that old geyser in the first place. I should have considered that he was committing political suicide by giving his VP candidacy ticket to Sarah Palin, an inexperienced Alaskan governor, all-around "hockey mom", and redneck who just loved to rail constantly against Obama without backing her own stances.
Nor was I particularly interested in Obama, either: politics being politics, I'm not holding anything against for or against him until he actually does something. Regardless, the lesser of two evils will be in the White House starting January 20, 2009. Yes, I know his speech following his victory was moving and tear-jerking to his groupies, but I don't take words. I consider actions. The previous U.S. presidents have railed on the same things over and over again prior to their terms in office.
One of them ended with a stain on the blouse of an intern.
My point is that while I admire Obama's charisma, I will still keep him in the limelight until he actually turns country policy around. The same goes for the Middle East: his policies sound more hawkish than Hillary Clinton (who herself is a disaster of epic proportions). At best, Obama may actually bring stability to the Middle East, but I don't see him as some sort of messianic figure that will help the Middle Eastern people back up on their feet: it would be against American interests to tip over tyrannical governments that serve their interests.
He might not be in any shape or form able to tip the scales of the Israeli-Palestine conflict towards the middle and/or find an equitable solution to both sides. Then again, American intervention is what's making it worse in the first place.
The campaign itself was fraught with the usual immaturity of political bipartisanship and bantering. I wonder if it's going to be any different in the next 4 or 8 years should the Americans re-elect Obama in 2012. Either way, I'm not holding my breath.
Salaam, from Saracen
Comments
Post a Comment