Skip to main content

"A Shoe on Your Head": the Romantic Story of Bush and the 2 Size 10's

I know this story is long overdue, and that I haven't been writing in a while. There are more things to life than sitting in front of a computer and rambling about whatever comes your way in the news or your daily experiences. But anyways, to the issue at hand. Last year on December the 14th, Muntazer al-Zaidi, an Iraqi reporter from the Iraqi-owned and Egyptian-based Al-Baghdadia TV (البغدادية), threw 2 "size 10" shoes (according to Dubya) at the then pResident of the U.S., George W. Bush (1). All Dubya could do was smile at Zaidi, who was then assailed by Iraqi security forces and taken into custody. Of course, that was all said and done at the time, and usually at other events involving political figures being assailed one way or another by angry protestors, the news of such things tends to die off or remain in memory as an event alone.

Of course, that's for most events of this theme.

Sadly, Western - and unfortunately this time around, Arab - media outlets have a tendency to over-romanticize these "bizarre" events as expressions of cultural norms or something that pertains solely to culture, and de-valuing the role of the individual at that point (2, 3, 4). The biggest example is how some media pundits tend to focus more on supposed Islamic misinterpretations as being behind some major terrorist attack as opposed to examining the individual motives behind the attackers and their socio-psychological histories (5).

In this case, the ever-so-present insult of raising the shoe in Arab culture became the headlines on December 15, NOT the notion of an angry journalist throwing a pair at the man who was solely responsible for leaving Iraq in the third-world developmental nightmare that it is in right now. I would have expected to at least see analysts talking about the motives of this man and questioning as to what brought him to do such a thing, not show April 2003 footage of Iraqi mobs slapping the head of a fallen Saddam statue (believe me, I'd love to join them myself, but that's besides the point; 6). This footage has been added to the repository of images and fantasies that is Orientalism, and indeed we see the hand of Orientalism at play here.

What's surprising is the reaction of the Arab world. Protests in Iraq supporting Zaidi involved banners with shoes on top of them (7). They also appeared in protests against the Gaza bombardment (which I will discuss soon) in places as far as Istanbul and London (8). I once saw a Kuwaiti politician on some obscure Arabic channel raise his shoe at Abbas in protest of the latter's unwillingness to help the Gazan populace in this time of need. Even the brand of shoes that were thrown at Bush had their sales skyrocket following the incident.

Still, though, I wouldn't go as far as to say that the shoe will become the new symbol for Pan-Arab nationalism and resistance.

Salaam, from Saracen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Politics as an "Outflow of Culture": Unmasking Racism in today's Socioeconomic Scene

A common yet grave fallacy is to assume that (the actions of) (part of) the infrastructure of a particular country at a particular time and place is derived from a singular cause, of which a metaphysical nature attributed to said cause would be even more so. That said, attributing (a perception of) (failed) politics as an "outflow" of a country's culture is in my honest opinion a crock of bull. I'm not denying that culture and politics are related: there clearly is a relationship between the two in the broader historical context. However, this reductionist outlook panders to more than your garden variety racism, itself being built on misinterpretations and misunderstandings. Why is that? First of all, consider that politics and culture are mutually exclusive concepts, although their definitions may not appear to be so on the surface. Politics (according to the pseudo-omniscient Wikipedia [1] ) is a process by which groups of people make collective decisions. The...

Book Review: "The Third Chimpanzee" by Jared Diamond

Jared Diamond is sort of a rock star in the sphere of biogeography (and science in general depending on your perspective). He is more a doom-sayer than a soothe-sayer, a prophet warning of the destruction of society and mankind as a whole. His magnum opus and prophetic text " Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies" has received accolades from a variety of sources, the least of which was the Pulitzer Prize in 1998. Having read that book myself, I came into his lesser-known essay " The Third Chimpanzee " with the expectation that it would be entertaining and enlightening at the same time. Gladly, I was not disappointed, but a glaring issue exists that I will address later. The first book published by Jared Diamond, " The Third Chimpanzee " explores the progression of human evolution in four parts. In the first, he explores the biological premises of our relationship to two other primate species, the common and pygmy chimpanzees (now c...

What Needs to be Said about the Gaza Massacre

It has been a tumultuous week that has passed. Ever since seeing the soul-crushing news of 61 (SIXTY ONE) Palestinians murdered as they were protesting their rights to be free from the open-air prison of Gaza, I've been sick to my stomach and heartbroken. The blood of my brothers and sisters spilt over the sands of the Gaza Strip ran aplenty as if it were cheap. Men, women, children, journalists, and medical personnel were slaughtered in cold blood with live ammunition from guns fired by Israeli terrorist soldiers hundreds of yards away overlooking the "border". What did the shameful Western media do about it? CNN claims "dozens die at the border". The NYT published multiple sham propaganda attempts disguised as "opinion pieces" blaming the Palestinians for their deaths, even going as far as to dehumanize them and negate their suffering. Even the BBC had the gall to call them "clashes". "Clashes"?! It was a massacre! Murde...