Skip to main content

God and Palestine

Well, what about God and Palestine? You might think that this is a topic on Palestinian nationalism, but it's not. This topic will address the question posed by many Jews, Zionists, Muslims and Christians: who did God give the land of Palestine to?

As a Muslim, I am a strong opponent to Zionism, the belief of establishing sole Jewish sovereignity over the land of Palestine, including the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, as well as creating a Jewish majority over the region. Zionism is a Jewish belief, and while not all Jews are Zionists, not all Zionists are Jews. For example, there are Christian Zionists, who believe that the creation of the State of Israel was a fulfillment of God's plan, and that He will come down as Jesus as the State of Israel expands "from the Nile to the Euphrates", the land that "God gave them" (them as in the 12 tribes of Judah, or the Jews: "God's Chosen People"). Surprisingly, there are also Muslim Zionists, who refer to several verses in the Quran that cite that the Jews have a "sacred right" to the land of Israel (according to them).

Jewish Anti-Zionists claim that their only salvation is when the Messiah comes down and establishes the State of Israel, which will be a Halakha (Jewish theocracy), in the end of times, and that a secular government over stolen land is not what they consider as representative of the world Jewry. Christian Anti-Zionists, citing similar reasons, also cite the idea that the Children of Israel broke God's Covenant several times. Muslim anti-Zionists like myself cite the same reasons as the Christians in that the Children of Israel have lost their sole right to this land, and to the fact that God Himself is not a racist, and would never give a single piece of land to one group of people, whether they be Muslim, Christian or Jewish.

So, who did God give Palestine to anyways?

Answer: Humans.

God did not give Palestine to Jews, nor Christians, nor Muslims. Granted, the mosques of Al Aqsa and the Dome of the Rock make Jerusalem sacred for Muslims, but there are other sites like the Church of the Holy Sepulchre and the Wailing Wall that make it Holy to Jews and Christians as well. But is it only for the people of these religions? There is no mention in the Quran of this land belonging to anyone, and these verses, with the proper translation and commentary, prove that indeed God gave the land of Palestine to human beings, just like He gave this Earth to human beings in the beginning of Time.
[17:70]Verily we have honoured the Children of Adam. We carry them on the land and the sea, and have made provision of good things for them, and have preferred them above many of those whom We created with a marked preferment.
After Adam ate from the Forbidden Tree,
[7:24]God said: "Get ye down. With enmity between yourselves. On earth will be your dwelling-place and your means of livelihood,- for a time."
In that sense, we as humans are God's Chosen Creation. For sure, we have our own beliefs, but to say that Palestine is for one religious group only would be a crime. Palestine is for the original inhabitants of the land: the Palestinians and the Jews who lived there at the time before the Diaspora of the Palestinians. However, I don't oppose immigration to the Holy Lands on part of Jews as long as Christians and Muslims have the same right. The Jews are not special, and do not deserve this land for themselves and themselves alone. But then again, who will have jurisdiction and sovereignity over these lands? Will it be the Jews, or the Christians or the Muslims?

History is immutable: we can't change what happened. Most of Palestine is under Israeli sovereignity, and there are first-generation and second-generation Israelis who were born there, and have lived their lives there to claim this place as their home. However, if the Palestinians are granted the Right to Return, and pre-1967 borders with the eviction of all settlements from the West Bank or a one-state solution is established, then peace will be achieved. But for the sake of the topic, Palestine is for human beings. It's not for any religious group alone.

Salaam, from
Saracen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Politics as an "Outflow of Culture": Unmasking Racism in today's Socioeconomic Scene

A common yet grave fallacy is to assume that (the actions of) (part of) the infrastructure of a particular country at a particular time and place is derived from a singular cause, of which a metaphysical nature attributed to said cause would be even more so. That said, attributing (a perception of) (failed) politics as an "outflow" of a country's culture is in my honest opinion a crock of bull. I'm not denying that culture and politics are related: there clearly is a relationship between the two in the broader historical context. However, this reductionist outlook panders to more than your garden variety racism, itself being built on misinterpretations and misunderstandings. Why is that? First of all, consider that politics and culture are mutually exclusive concepts, although their definitions may not appear to be so on the surface. Politics (according to the pseudo-omniscient Wikipedia [1] ) is a process by which groups of people make collective decisions. The...

Book Review: "The Third Chimpanzee" by Jared Diamond

Jared Diamond is sort of a rock star in the sphere of biogeography (and science in general depending on your perspective). He is more a doom-sayer than a soothe-sayer, a prophet warning of the destruction of society and mankind as a whole. His magnum opus and prophetic text " Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies" has received accolades from a variety of sources, the least of which was the Pulitzer Prize in 1998. Having read that book myself, I came into his lesser-known essay " The Third Chimpanzee " with the expectation that it would be entertaining and enlightening at the same time. Gladly, I was not disappointed, but a glaring issue exists that I will address later. The first book published by Jared Diamond, " The Third Chimpanzee " explores the progression of human evolution in four parts. In the first, he explores the biological premises of our relationship to two other primate species, the common and pygmy chimpanzees (now c...

On "Leviathan", by Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury (Part 1: On Man)

Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan , or The Matter, Forme, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil,  is a veritable juggernaut (pun intended) of a book. It is Hobbes' magnum opus, having been circulated widely by the turn of the 17th and 18th Centuries at a time when England was plunged into civil war. Rather than rebel against the new political order (a war crime according to Hobbes which I will revisit later in this post), Hobbes' central thesis is to submit to the absolute authority of an established commonwealth (preferably, in Hobbes' point of view, a "Christian" one), which he compares to the overwhelming biblical sea monster, the Leviathan. Having just finished reading it, I would like to convey my thoughts on his central themes in as short a post as allowed by the breadth of the knowledge he passed on with this read. For this post, I will stick to part 1 (On Man), and deal with the subsequent parts of the book in later posts. Summary of P...