Skip to main content

On Sectarianism in Islam

As time progresses from a religion's birth, it is more likely for a religion to split into several different sects as per the different interpretations and teachings that come about in these times, on the part of several religious figures in a particular religion. We have seen many Christian divisions - Orthodox, Catholic and Protestant, among others - as well as several Jewish divisions - Orthodox, Reform, Conservative, among others - and even divisions in Islam like the Sunnites and Shi'ites.

However, the sectarian division of Islam in its later years was prophesized and explained by the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) himself.
"Awf ibn Malik reported that the Prophet (Peace be upon him) said, 'The Jews split into 71 sects: one will enter Paradise and 70 will enter Hell. The Christians split into 72 sects: 71 will enter Hell and one will enter Paradise. By Him in Whose hand is my soul, my Ummah will split into 73 sects: one will enter Paradise and 72 will enter Hell.' Someone asked, 'O Messenger ofAllah (Peace be upon him), who will they be?' He replied, 'The main body of the Muslims (al-Jama'ah).' Awf ibn Malik is the only one who reported this Hadith, and its isnad is acceptable." And in another version of this Hadith the Prophet (Peace be upon him) goes onto say that the saved sect, "...Are those who follow my and my Sahaba's path" (Tirmidhi, vol. 2, pg. 89)
This is just one of the same set of prophecies as explained by the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). This should not be surprising: at each time in a certain religion's history, a "pioneer" comes about with his own interpretation of a certain religion. For example, Muslims in Turkey have brought about the Sufi sect of Islam. Those in Lebanon have brought about the Druze sect, though it is strongly argued that the Druze are not Muslims or even close to them. Of course, there is also the main sectarian division between the Sunnites and the Shi'ites, who argue that the Archangel Gabriel missed by a mile and should have gone to Ali, who was destined to be the "Last Prophet".

As a Sunnite, I worship God and believe in the Message, the Holy Quran, that was revealed to the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). In that, I believe as well his words and his actions mentioned in the Hadith. And thus, I believe him when he says that his followers, the Orthodox Muslims, or the "Ahl al Sunna wal Jama'ah" are the only ones amongst the Muslim sects that are going to Heaven.

However, the political sects of Islam are being exploited to bring down and disunite the Muslim ummah (community), as is what is happening in Iraq and Lebanon: Sunnites and Shi'ite political sects are being pitted against each other due to underhanded actions on part of the Coalition (in Iraq) and the Israelis (in Palestine, and have a degree of influence on Lebanon). This is not new: sectarianism has always been a source of disunity in the past, as can be seen during the rise of Protestantism, and the case in Northern Ireland. It is also due to the notion that none of the sects will be able to find common grounds in certain cases, as each member of a sect has a conviction that his/her sect is the one that conforms most to their religion's teachings.

I have a handful of friends who are Ahmadi and Shi'ite, and I used to ask them about their beliefs. It just struck me that, in the end, we are all Muslims who worship One God and believe in the Message that was revealed to Muhammad (peace be upon him), even though we may differ in certain peripheral beliefs. On the other hand, such sectarianism has been the source of political strife and disunity, and only until Muslims realize that the Way of the Ahl-al-Sunna wal Jama'ah is the right path will we be able to destroy all such strife, and return to the Golden Days of Islam, when Muslims were at the forefront of almost everything.

Salaam, from
Saracen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What "Culture Clash"?

I hear this all the time, and yet I still have yet to not only materialistically comprehend this prospect, but to philosophically grasp it. There are so many cultures and races that dot this earth, and yet we have seen them come and go as well. But how can cultures themselves clash? To answer this question, one should take a look at the definition of culture. The word culture , from the Latin colo, -ere, with its root meaning "to cultivate", generally refers to patterns of human activity and the symbolic structures that give such activity significance. Different definitions of "culture" reflect different theoretical bases for understanding, or criteria for evaluating, human activity. Note the definition: patterns of personal activity. Patterns by themselves are immeasurable and also immaterial. However, the only material object encountered in the definition is the set of "symbolic structures" that represent these patterns and give them significance. Cult

حول قرار حماس تشكيل قوة مشتركة من الفصائل

هذا النص يتحدث عن التشقق في الحكومة الفلسطينية, وكيف استغلوا القوات الصهيونية على التفرق بين حماس ومنظمة التخريب " فتح" التي خانت الفاسطينيون لخدمة نفسها ولخدمة "إسراءيل". تأليف د. إبراهيم علوش قرار وزير داخلية السلطة الفلسطينية، القائمة على مرجعية اتفاقية أوسلو، بتشكيل قوة مشتركة من الفصائل العسكرية الفلسطينية المقاومة، وقرار محمود عباس رئيس سلطة أوسلو بشطب قرار وزير الداخلية سعيد صيام بتشكيل تلك القوة المشتركة، أثار الكثير من التكهنات واللغط حول مغزى تلك الخطوة وأبعادها. ومثل كل قرار سياسي، هناك دائماً واجهة خارجية وأجندة خفية، خاصة عندما نتعامل مع قوى قررت أن تكون جزءاً من الواقع السائد بدلاً من الانقلاب عليه. فالانضمام لركب أوسلو، على أساس مشروع "تغييره من الداخل"، يترك المرء بالضرورة أسير مساومات لا يمكن إلا أن تمس بالثوابت وبالمرجعيات التاريخية لصراعنا مع الحركة الصهيونية منذ أكثر من قرن. وبالمقابل، فإن قرار محمود عباس بشطب قرار وزير الداخلية يرتبط بدوره بحسابات التنافس الداخلي، ليس فقط على الصلاحيات، بل على كل دوره التاريخي هو وفتح. المهم، يمكن أن ت

Book Review: "The Crusade through Arab Eyes" by Amin Maalouf

The bulk of modern history regarding the Crusades has an unashamedly Western slant to it. Even a cursory search of the word "crusade" on Amazon Books reveals a plethora of books written by authors from the U.K., the U.S., and elsewhere in the Western world, but a severe (emphasis) paucity of books from a more Arab perspective. One book that stands out is Amin Maalouf's "The Crusades through Arab Eyes", a book I believe is much-needed given the overall bias inherent in the gestalt of Western history books on this topic. The gold standard for history on the Crusades is currently the "The Oxford History of the Crusades", another book I will review in the not-so-distant future (and expect comparisons to this book given that I have completed reading it). The too-long-didn't-read version of this review is the following: if you're interested in history, buy it, read it, and keep it. Nevertheless, my full review follows. For those who are un