Skip to main content

The Arab Press these Days...

Well, what can you say about them? All we've been seeing in the newspapers these days is much more coverage on the Lebanon issue than the much-overlooked Palestine and Iraq crises. It's just that when I take a look at the first pages of most newspapers, the Palestine and Iraq conflicts are left for much later pages, even those after the Lebanese-Israeli conflict.

For example, the young yet prominent Jordanian daily, Al Ghad (supposedly meaning "Tomorrow" or "The Future", and I still don't know why they call it that), has a story on its front page depicting local news regarding the conflict, even though that most of its headlines regard Lebanon, with references to Lebanese leaders and how they want to deal with the current situation. Also, in the Latest News Section (آخر الأخبار), only 2 out of 13 stories deal with Palestine and Iraq (one for each, which talks about 8 casualties in Rafah, and 14 more in a checkpoint south of Baghdad).

Kuwait's Al Watan ("The Nation") is in a similar condition. While Gulf newspapers stick largely to local news more than others do, the International News section ("الخارجية") is riddled with tales from Lebanon, including a report on continued air strikes on Lebanon, a small primer on the Qana Massacre, and a casualty count of all Lebanese who have perished in this disproportionate war. Like Al Ghad, Al Watan has mentioned the recent Rafah killings among other things like the 30 casualties resulting from disemminated attacks in Iraq.

Now, on to another more notable newspaper, Asharq Al Awsat (thank God they have an English version for this one). The front page states a story regarding the bombing of Beirut, as well as the pseudo-comical capture of Hassan Nasrallah, a card game player who has the same name as the Hizbullah leader. There is also the story of how "boycott fever" returned because of the ongoing Lebanon and Palestine crises (I hate to admit, but boycotts, even though they work most of the time when done right, won't work on Israel due to the aid grants and military aid that it receives, though a boycott might do well to send a message).

As a last example, I present to you Al Hayat ("The Life", though I think that is a stupid name for a London-based newspaper). While I admit that the frontpage is riddled more with opinionated columns than actual news reports, most of them such as this one still pander more about the Lebanon crisis. Other opinion pieces on the site include a lambasting of Arab impotence, and a criticism of the racist impulse that gives the impression that Arab blood is "cheap". Taking a look at the other news links on my sidebar, you will find pretty much the same issue: that Palestine and Iraq have faded away from view.

What I'm trying to get at is that while I support the Lebanese people, there are a lot of victims out there who still need as much attention as the Lebanese. We have the Palestinians, who suffer from this death and destruction almost every month if not every week if not every day. We also have the Afghans who are still under U.S. occupation, along with their Iraqi brothers. We support them all because they are our Muslim and Christian Arab brothers, and they are suffering under an unjust and brutal occuppation, and are under constant threat of attack, kidnapping and bombardment. God answer our prayers at this crucial time.

Salaam, from
Saracen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Politics as an "Outflow of Culture": Unmasking Racism in today's Socioeconomic Scene

A common yet grave fallacy is to assume that (the actions of) (part of) the infrastructure of a particular country at a particular time and place is derived from a singular cause, of which a metaphysical nature attributed to said cause would be even more so. That said, attributing (a perception of) (failed) politics as an "outflow" of a country's culture is in my honest opinion a crock of bull. I'm not denying that culture and politics are related: there clearly is a relationship between the two in the broader historical context. However, this reductionist outlook panders to more than your garden variety racism, itself being built on misinterpretations and misunderstandings. Why is that? First of all, consider that politics and culture are mutually exclusive concepts, although their definitions may not appear to be so on the surface. Politics (according to the pseudo-omniscient Wikipedia [1] ) is a process by which groups of people make collective decisions. The...

Book Review: "The Third Chimpanzee" by Jared Diamond

Jared Diamond is sort of a rock star in the sphere of biogeography (and science in general depending on your perspective). He is more a doom-sayer than a soothe-sayer, a prophet warning of the destruction of society and mankind as a whole. His magnum opus and prophetic text " Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies" has received accolades from a variety of sources, the least of which was the Pulitzer Prize in 1998. Having read that book myself, I came into his lesser-known essay " The Third Chimpanzee " with the expectation that it would be entertaining and enlightening at the same time. Gladly, I was not disappointed, but a glaring issue exists that I will address later. The first book published by Jared Diamond, " The Third Chimpanzee " explores the progression of human evolution in four parts. In the first, he explores the biological premises of our relationship to two other primate species, the common and pygmy chimpanzees (now c...

On "Leviathan", by Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury (Part 1: On Man)

Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan , or The Matter, Forme, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil,  is a veritable juggernaut (pun intended) of a book. It is Hobbes' magnum opus, having been circulated widely by the turn of the 17th and 18th Centuries at a time when England was plunged into civil war. Rather than rebel against the new political order (a war crime according to Hobbes which I will revisit later in this post), Hobbes' central thesis is to submit to the absolute authority of an established commonwealth (preferably, in Hobbes' point of view, a "Christian" one), which he compares to the overwhelming biblical sea monster, the Leviathan. Having just finished reading it, I would like to convey my thoughts on his central themes in as short a post as allowed by the breadth of the knowledge he passed on with this read. For this post, I will stick to part 1 (On Man), and deal with the subsequent parts of the book in later posts. Summary of P...