Skip to main content

Terrorism in Canada: A Product of Multiculturalism or Military Operation?

The nation of Canada was surprised with a raid that produced several "terror" suspects who were going to bomb a place in downtown Toronto, Ontario. After the recent court issuing, etc., debates have since flared all over, with issues of religion and politics being brought into focus as Canada looks like it might enter the world political sphere proper. It's strange, though: Canada has a reputation for its tolerant society and an air of multiculturalism, with people hailing from all over the world. Canada's society is more like a cultural mosaic than a cultural "melting pot", where immigrants are forced to abide by the nation's values and incorporate them into their traditions (i.e. being forced to live the nation's culture instead of their own).

However, the issue here is whether the Canadians were being too acceptive or not. The rightwing pundits in U.S. media glorified themselves in criticizing Canada for its liberal laws, allowing more immigration into the country. These people went to the extent of accusing Canada of harboring Al Qaeda members unbenknownest to the Canadian government in Ottawa. Such accusations hint at borderline racism because it is assumed that "terror" is a part of the cultures or the alleged "terrorists". The point that these critics are making is that the Canadians have failed to incorporate the practice of melting pot assimilation, which, according to the Americans, is enforcing a "superior" culture on those who visit. Of course, such views are subjective to different opinions on the matter.

On the other hand, one could say that this small-time "terror" operation was probably a symptom of Canada's active support for the Afghan campaign, even though the Canadian Army is planning an early pullout from the country in a few months time. Despite the blindness of rightwingers to their actions, they still continued to lambaste Canada's acceptance for diversity amongst their midst. Of course, such issues are akin to nationalism, as in the case of illegal immigrants in the states, which sparked up furious debate. To answer all these accusations, Canadian freelance columnist Joshua Hergesheimer nailed the coffin with this article he wrote on Al Jazeera.net. He highlights the blindness of rightwingers in the so-called "war on terror", stating that "blaming extremism on social policies such as multiculturalism rather than on realities of war and occupation may be comforting for some Americans", meaning that the issue of culture and race brought into politics is okay for Americans as long as it consorts to their views. Such views are arrogant in nature, and should be avoided.

It is also argued that people who engage in terrorism are "anti-social", as Joshua writes that
Issues such as alienation and radicalisation of young people need to be dealt with in the community, in pool halls and youth clubs, with the support of social workers, teachers and parents, not on television talk shows or political soapboxes.
The issue of alienation from society is a tough one to tackle. You're talking about induced psychosis on one hand, and getting information from supposed "terror leaders" on the other, regarding, for example, illegal occupation abroad in Muslim nations like Afghanistan and Iraq. But think of it this way: Canada has not suffered from any such attacks before. It has been an accepting society and far from a breeding ground for "terrorists". There is the case, for example, of Maher Arar, the Arab and Canadian citizen who was arrested for supposed links to Al Qaeda that sprouted when he made a stopover in New York, after meeting a man who was, unknownignly to Arar, allegedly an Al Qaeda operative. Such an argument could add ammunition to those against multiculturalism.

But those are not the only issues. Again, highlighting the blindness of the right and its failure to accept accountability, Joshua continues to write,
The proposition that extremism is encouraged because of the attempt by multicultural states to accommodate diversity, rather than viewed as a reaction to the grim realities of war and occupation, takes the entire discourse to an even higher level of absurdity than the flimsy excuses used to justify linking the “war on terror” and the invasion of Iraq.
This is technically why rightwingers - well, a lot of them - resent political correctness, keeping discussion and debate defined within the political sphere. While I admit that some rightwingers stick to the issue of terrorism as a two-way street, a lot don't. The key here is that there is always an action that causes a reaction, and so forth. In the case of interventionism, take a look at the past 50 years and how the American administration supported puppet governments that abused their own people. Now, we're talking about supporting a "war on terror" where Afghans are being killed by occupation troops and a puppet government that has not met the demands of the people. So, technically, the idea that "terrorism" in Canada is a product of multiculturalism is ludicruous.

Joshua raises an excellent point here:
My fear is that the crucial issues have now been manipulated to such an extent that people may actually begin to believe that the values on which ostensibly liberal democratic societies are constructed – the acceptance of diversity and openness to alternative conceptions of citizenship and community – are the real catalyst for extremism.
An accepting society would not really catalyze extremism; on the other hand, a cultural melting pot would because it would polarize the views of the immigrants to the extent that they would cause actions like terrorist operations. However, seeing that multiculturalism, being the accepting society that it promotes, causes terrorism, I agree with Joshua that
Especially at this critical time, Canada needs to stand up for the values that set it apart from America. Multiculturalism and the acceptance of diversity is not the problem. But unless Canadians defend their social policies by living them out every day, in direct defiance of people who blame multiculturalism for the current problems, there may soon be nothing left to champion.
Amen.

Salaam, from
Saracen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What "Culture Clash"?

I hear this all the time, and yet I still have yet to not only materialistically comprehend this prospect, but to philosophically grasp it. There are so many cultures and races that dot this earth, and yet we have seen them come and go as well. But how can cultures themselves clash? To answer this question, one should take a look at the definition of culture. The word culture , from the Latin colo, -ere, with its root meaning "to cultivate", generally refers to patterns of human activity and the symbolic structures that give such activity significance. Different definitions of "culture" reflect different theoretical bases for understanding, or criteria for evaluating, human activity. Note the definition: patterns of personal activity. Patterns by themselves are immeasurable and also immaterial. However, the only material object encountered in the definition is the set of "symbolic structures" that represent these patterns and give them significance. Cult

حول قرار حماس تشكيل قوة مشتركة من الفصائل

هذا النص يتحدث عن التشقق في الحكومة الفلسطينية, وكيف استغلوا القوات الصهيونية على التفرق بين حماس ومنظمة التخريب " فتح" التي خانت الفاسطينيون لخدمة نفسها ولخدمة "إسراءيل". تأليف د. إبراهيم علوش قرار وزير داخلية السلطة الفلسطينية، القائمة على مرجعية اتفاقية أوسلو، بتشكيل قوة مشتركة من الفصائل العسكرية الفلسطينية المقاومة، وقرار محمود عباس رئيس سلطة أوسلو بشطب قرار وزير الداخلية سعيد صيام بتشكيل تلك القوة المشتركة، أثار الكثير من التكهنات واللغط حول مغزى تلك الخطوة وأبعادها. ومثل كل قرار سياسي، هناك دائماً واجهة خارجية وأجندة خفية، خاصة عندما نتعامل مع قوى قررت أن تكون جزءاً من الواقع السائد بدلاً من الانقلاب عليه. فالانضمام لركب أوسلو، على أساس مشروع "تغييره من الداخل"، يترك المرء بالضرورة أسير مساومات لا يمكن إلا أن تمس بالثوابت وبالمرجعيات التاريخية لصراعنا مع الحركة الصهيونية منذ أكثر من قرن. وبالمقابل، فإن قرار محمود عباس بشطب قرار وزير الداخلية يرتبط بدوره بحسابات التنافس الداخلي، ليس فقط على الصلاحيات، بل على كل دوره التاريخي هو وفتح. المهم، يمكن أن ت

Book Review: "The Crusade through Arab Eyes" by Amin Maalouf

The bulk of modern history regarding the Crusades has an unashamedly Western slant to it. Even a cursory search of the word "crusade" on Amazon Books reveals a plethora of books written by authors from the U.K., the U.S., and elsewhere in the Western world, but a severe (emphasis) paucity of books from a more Arab perspective. One book that stands out is Amin Maalouf's "The Crusades through Arab Eyes", a book I believe is much-needed given the overall bias inherent in the gestalt of Western history books on this topic. The gold standard for history on the Crusades is currently the "The Oxford History of the Crusades", another book I will review in the not-so-distant future (and expect comparisons to this book given that I have completed reading it). The too-long-didn't-read version of this review is the following: if you're interested in history, buy it, read it, and keep it. Nevertheless, my full review follows. For those who are un