Skip to main content

The Arab Press these Days...

Well, what can you say about them? All we've been seeing in the newspapers these days is much more coverage on the Lebanon issue than the much-overlooked Palestine and Iraq crises. It's just that when I take a look at the first pages of most newspapers, the Palestine and Iraq conflicts are left for much later pages, even those after the Lebanese-Israeli conflict.

For example, the young yet prominent Jordanian daily, Al Ghad (supposedly meaning "Tomorrow" or "The Future", and I still don't know why they call it that), has a story on its front page depicting local news regarding the conflict, even though that most of its headlines regard Lebanon, with references to Lebanese leaders and how they want to deal with the current situation. Also, in the Latest News Section (آخر الأخبار), only 2 out of 13 stories deal with Palestine and Iraq (one for each, which talks about 8 casualties in Rafah, and 14 more in a checkpoint south of Baghdad).

Kuwait's Al Watan ("The Nation") is in a similar condition. While Gulf newspapers stick largely to local news more than others do, the International News section ("الخارجية") is riddled with tales from Lebanon, including a report on continued air strikes on Lebanon, a small primer on the Qana Massacre, and a casualty count of all Lebanese who have perished in this disproportionate war. Like Al Ghad, Al Watan has mentioned the recent Rafah killings among other things like the 30 casualties resulting from disemminated attacks in Iraq.

Now, on to another more notable newspaper, Asharq Al Awsat (thank God they have an English version for this one). The front page states a story regarding the bombing of Beirut, as well as the pseudo-comical capture of Hassan Nasrallah, a card game player who has the same name as the Hizbullah leader. There is also the story of how "boycott fever" returned because of the ongoing Lebanon and Palestine crises (I hate to admit, but boycotts, even though they work most of the time when done right, won't work on Israel due to the aid grants and military aid that it receives, though a boycott might do well to send a message).

As a last example, I present to you Al Hayat ("The Life", though I think that is a stupid name for a London-based newspaper). While I admit that the frontpage is riddled more with opinionated columns than actual news reports, most of them such as this one still pander more about the Lebanon crisis. Other opinion pieces on the site include a lambasting of Arab impotence, and a criticism of the racist impulse that gives the impression that Arab blood is "cheap". Taking a look at the other news links on my sidebar, you will find pretty much the same issue: that Palestine and Iraq have faded away from view.

What I'm trying to get at is that while I support the Lebanese people, there are a lot of victims out there who still need as much attention as the Lebanese. We have the Palestinians, who suffer from this death and destruction almost every month if not every week if not every day. We also have the Afghans who are still under U.S. occupation, along with their Iraqi brothers. We support them all because they are our Muslim and Christian Arab brothers, and they are suffering under an unjust and brutal occuppation, and are under constant threat of attack, kidnapping and bombardment. God answer our prayers at this crucial time.

Salaam, from
Saracen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What "Culture Clash"?

I hear this all the time, and yet I still have yet to not only materialistically comprehend this prospect, but to philosophically grasp it. There are so many cultures and races that dot this earth, and yet we have seen them come and go as well. But how can cultures themselves clash? To answer this question, one should take a look at the definition of culture. The word culture , from the Latin colo, -ere, with its root meaning "to cultivate", generally refers to patterns of human activity and the symbolic structures that give such activity significance. Different definitions of "culture" reflect different theoretical bases for understanding, or criteria for evaluating, human activity. Note the definition: patterns of personal activity. Patterns by themselves are immeasurable and also immaterial. However, the only material object encountered in the definition is the set of "symbolic structures" that represent these patterns and give them significance. Cult

حول قرار حماس تشكيل قوة مشتركة من الفصائل

هذا النص يتحدث عن التشقق في الحكومة الفلسطينية, وكيف استغلوا القوات الصهيونية على التفرق بين حماس ومنظمة التخريب " فتح" التي خانت الفاسطينيون لخدمة نفسها ولخدمة "إسراءيل". تأليف د. إبراهيم علوش قرار وزير داخلية السلطة الفلسطينية، القائمة على مرجعية اتفاقية أوسلو، بتشكيل قوة مشتركة من الفصائل العسكرية الفلسطينية المقاومة، وقرار محمود عباس رئيس سلطة أوسلو بشطب قرار وزير الداخلية سعيد صيام بتشكيل تلك القوة المشتركة، أثار الكثير من التكهنات واللغط حول مغزى تلك الخطوة وأبعادها. ومثل كل قرار سياسي، هناك دائماً واجهة خارجية وأجندة خفية، خاصة عندما نتعامل مع قوى قررت أن تكون جزءاً من الواقع السائد بدلاً من الانقلاب عليه. فالانضمام لركب أوسلو، على أساس مشروع "تغييره من الداخل"، يترك المرء بالضرورة أسير مساومات لا يمكن إلا أن تمس بالثوابت وبالمرجعيات التاريخية لصراعنا مع الحركة الصهيونية منذ أكثر من قرن. وبالمقابل، فإن قرار محمود عباس بشطب قرار وزير الداخلية يرتبط بدوره بحسابات التنافس الداخلي، ليس فقط على الصلاحيات، بل على كل دوره التاريخي هو وفتح. المهم، يمكن أن ت

Book Review: "The Crusade through Arab Eyes" by Amin Maalouf

The bulk of modern history regarding the Crusades has an unashamedly Western slant to it. Even a cursory search of the word "crusade" on Amazon Books reveals a plethora of books written by authors from the U.K., the U.S., and elsewhere in the Western world, but a severe (emphasis) paucity of books from a more Arab perspective. One book that stands out is Amin Maalouf's "The Crusades through Arab Eyes", a book I believe is much-needed given the overall bias inherent in the gestalt of Western history books on this topic. The gold standard for history on the Crusades is currently the "The Oxford History of the Crusades", another book I will review in the not-so-distant future (and expect comparisons to this book given that I have completed reading it). The too-long-didn't-read version of this review is the following: if you're interested in history, buy it, read it, and keep it. Nevertheless, my full review follows. For those who are un