Skip to main content

Friend... or Pawn?

It's not always that you get the friends you want, or are able to keep up with company. Socially, I admit that I am a partial recluse. I don't see a lot of people, and I have a few friends that I can really count on and seriously call "friends". However, in life, many people end up making "friends" who turn out to be what we Arabs call maslahjiyeen, or those who take you for granted. I have happened to have a few of these myself. There was this one case where I had a study partner who seemingly treated me as a friend, but in the end was using me for his own ends. Just a few years later, the same person unleashed a tirade at me because of a test that HE (not I) failed at. I offered the best I could, but in the end, I felt like a pawn. It's like being used... At that point, I could say I felt lonely, or frustrated.

It took me a couple of days to get this through my head, and get over it in the first place. Whatever it is, the fact that this person used me as a pawn for his own ends was pissing enough. It's just that this world is full of nice people and bad people. Let's face it: that's life. But I really hate it when a friendship turns out to be one-sided, and I hate it even more that I am on either side. I don't like to be used as a pawn and as an effect hate it when I (un)intentionally use others as pawns as well. Pawning people is bad character and in fact dehumanizing. Why is that? Well, consider first that a human being has feelings. Second, a human being is not a tool, but a living being. Reference to a human being as inanimate is degrading in the sense that a human is compared to a doormat: people are not something you can brush your shoes on, and neither are their individual dignities (karameh). I for one have stopped caring much about people who use me as pawns, but I am never going to keep such a relationship alive.

A word for those who have been in my situation: don't dare take another relationship like that again. A study group might be fine, but if it's taking your time for the sake of the time(s) of your study partner(s), end that relationship or find a way to keep in contact without overdoing yourself. If you can get something out of it as much as they do, then I commend you on that. But in all cases, stay in contact with those you can really rely on, whether it be your friend, boyfriend or girlfriend (though I tend to be skeptical on the relationship involving the last 2 categories, and that is the subject of another topic). If such a pawning relationship is alright with you, then go ahead at your own risk, but I advise you to try to minimize the number of such relationships you have: such relationships degrade one's dignity, and the maintenance of such a relationship to a subservient extent is a sign of weakness in one's character. That's why I'd rather stand proud on both feet, with not a care for those who want to use me for their own ends. That way, I (and anyone else who follows this path) preserve my dignity and my character.

However, this does not mean that you should empower yourself over others. Maintaining such a belief in humanity (yeah, yeah, I know, I know... I talk about it all the time because it's IMPORTANT) is important: be kind to others, but be wary as well from those who do not follow the same path as you do. Be straightforward in your decisions and keep your friends close. Don't choose someone who will use you, or has no feelings towards you. Such people should be avoided, but one's kindness towards his fellow man or woman, whoever he/she may be, should be applied to maintain one's character and respect.

Either way, I'm happy that the false relationships I had before are over. I am happy the way I am. I have a few close friends and many acquaintances, but that does not raise (or even lower) my status as a human being. Even without friends, I will still treat people kindly and with respect. Having friends is not a strength, nor a weakness (though at certain times, both may apply). Having friends is just a sign that people with like minds stick together. Using people who have been misled to believing that you are their "friend" is not only a sign of weakness, but of demagoguery and lack of character. So I advise you: be careful of who you're friends with, and don't end up getting used like I did, because it makes you as bad as the person who used you in the first place.

Salaam, from
Saracen
:)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Politics as an "Outflow of Culture": Unmasking Racism in today's Socioeconomic Scene

A common yet grave fallacy is to assume that (the actions of) (part of) the infrastructure of a particular country at a particular time and place is derived from a singular cause, of which a metaphysical nature attributed to said cause would be even more so. That said, attributing (a perception of) (failed) politics as an "outflow" of a country's culture is in my honest opinion a crock of bull. I'm not denying that culture and politics are related: there clearly is a relationship between the two in the broader historical context. However, this reductionist outlook panders to more than your garden variety racism, itself being built on misinterpretations and misunderstandings. Why is that? First of all, consider that politics and culture are mutually exclusive concepts, although their definitions may not appear to be so on the surface. Politics (according to the pseudo-omniscient Wikipedia [1] ) is a process by which groups of people make collective decisions. The...

Book Review: "The Third Chimpanzee" by Jared Diamond

Jared Diamond is sort of a rock star in the sphere of biogeography (and science in general depending on your perspective). He is more a doom-sayer than a soothe-sayer, a prophet warning of the destruction of society and mankind as a whole. His magnum opus and prophetic text " Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies" has received accolades from a variety of sources, the least of which was the Pulitzer Prize in 1998. Having read that book myself, I came into his lesser-known essay " The Third Chimpanzee " with the expectation that it would be entertaining and enlightening at the same time. Gladly, I was not disappointed, but a glaring issue exists that I will address later. The first book published by Jared Diamond, " The Third Chimpanzee " explores the progression of human evolution in four parts. In the first, he explores the biological premises of our relationship to two other primate species, the common and pygmy chimpanzees (now c...

On "Leviathan", by Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury (Part 1: On Man)

Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan , or The Matter, Forme, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil,  is a veritable juggernaut (pun intended) of a book. It is Hobbes' magnum opus, having been circulated widely by the turn of the 17th and 18th Centuries at a time when England was plunged into civil war. Rather than rebel against the new political order (a war crime according to Hobbes which I will revisit later in this post), Hobbes' central thesis is to submit to the absolute authority of an established commonwealth (preferably, in Hobbes' point of view, a "Christian" one), which he compares to the overwhelming biblical sea monster, the Leviathan. Having just finished reading it, I would like to convey my thoughts on his central themes in as short a post as allowed by the breadth of the knowledge he passed on with this read. For this post, I will stick to part 1 (On Man), and deal with the subsequent parts of the book in later posts. Summary of P...