Skip to main content

Israeli Settlers: a Threat to Peace

Take a look at the town of Tel Rumeida in Palestine. Peaceful at first sight, but when you take a look closer, you'll find things are not always what they seem to be. You'll find Zionist settlers who are attacking Palestinian civilians. No wonder suicide bombers go and attack civilians. I would still condone and attack on soldiers ONLY, but this series of videos led me to drop all my sympathies with Israeli settlers and their so-called "plight". Personally, I'm not surprised, but I was shocked nonetheless at what settlers can do to disturb the peace.

I slightly concur with this opinion piece.
Eretz Yisroel, a settler friendly site put up an article which I find rather interesting. It talks about Psyops used in within the settler community in order to influence both the settlers (through use of agents provocateurs) and Israeli public opinion (through information that filters as a result of these staged events) about a number of issues. While there is very much in the article I don’t agree with, mainly its ideological impetus, there is however some useful information that is worthy of being read. The author (unnamed) claims that undercover agents are posing as radical settlers and they engage in violent militant acts that then serve as evidence to portray the settlers to the Israeli common man as extremists. One of these agents also encouraged Yigal Amir to assassinate Rabin. This claim is interesting, as it implicates that the secret services of Israel had some part in the planning and implementation of this crime.

The author believes that Israel is staging events so as to aid in creating the favourable environment necessary for the implementation of the policies the government intends upon using. If the average Israeli believes that the presence of settlers in Gaza only leads to violence, because these people are extremists and against peace, they will not protest against the Gaza disengagement. It also is creating an environment of hostility between the two segments of Israeli society, those living in Israel proper, and those who are living in the occupied territories. It is preparing a scenario of the logic of a civil war, making it an unavoidable prospect.

Here are a few excerpts:

“The second task was to deal with 'labeling' the segment of Israeli population which would be need to be relocated as 'outside the national consensus'. The West Bank and Gaza 'settlers' became 'opponents of peace', 'extremists', and for merely holding on to what had been Israeli government policy for years, they were labeled 'dangerous radicals'.”

“But when the PM Ariel Sharon resurrected the spirit of Oslo (which is basically an Israeli retreat) in the form of his policy of 'Disengagement', he once again hit a potentially hard sell with the Israeli public. Normally when a country redraws its borders, the residents remain where they are. In a bold step, Sharon insists that the Jewish residents of Gaza and portions of the West Bank be expelled. He has even threatened to use military force against Israeli civilians who wish to remain in their homes in Gaza and the West Bank. New legislation requiring up to three years in prison for anyone who resists evacuation is being pushed through the Knesset. Sharon has claimed that by the end of the year 2005, "Gaza will be free of Jews" - a phrase that upset a portion of the Israeli public being reminiscent of phrases used during WWII. As time past, Sharon hit more and more resistance to his policies.”

Arutz Sheva writes: “As tensions over the withdrawal/expulsion plan intensify, talk of a civil war or violence between Jews is also heating up. Some fear another Avishai Raviv-type provocation against the right-wing.”

“MK Tzvi Hendel, a resident of Gush Katif, said that the alleged attackers "cause harm not only to our cause, but also to the entire country. But they are only a tiny fraction of the entire populace, and they must be related to in this manner. It's actually the Prime Minister who sees fit to mention Judea, Samaria and Gaza and extremist Kach members in the same breath. A citizen who hears the Prime Minister make such an equation is liable to believe him... I don't see anyone being arrested. I'm beginning to think that this is another case of [Shabak agent-provocateur] Avishai Raviv, and that [these incidents] serve Sharon's ultimate objective of de-legitimizing all of us."Avishai Raviv (pictured above) is believed to have encouraged Yigal Amir to assassinate Yitzchak Rabin in 1995. Among other evidence, two high school girls said they heard Raviv goad Yigal Amir into assassinating Rabin. Raviv was similarly the driving force behind the fictitious Eyal organization, which "took credit" for attacks against Arabs that never occurred - leading to the ostracizing of the nationalist camp by many.”

“The police department plans to grant "immunity" to police officers charged by settlers with undue violence during the expulsion from Gaza. So reports the Yediot Acharonot newspaper today. The report states that the police believe that the settlers plan to "intimidate" policemen from carrying out the evacuation by filing illegitimate complaints charging them with undue violence and the like. The police will therefore not suspend these policemen, in keeping with long-running custom, but will rather investigate the charges even as the policemen continue to carry out their jobs.”
I concur with it in the sense that Israeli settlers are in fact extremists... well, a lot of them are, as per the Tel Rumeida project.

According to BBC's Kathryn Westcott,
There are about 240,000 settlers in the West Bank, populating some 120 fully fledged settlements and dozens of "outposts". These are little more than mobile homes or prefabricated buildings on isolated hilltops. Huge Jewish blocks split the West Bank into isolated Palestinian land, and a number of key settlements would have to be abandoned to make way for a viable, contiguous Palestinian state. At the moment, the massive Ariel settlement to the north, the Jerusalem settlements - where a further 160,000 settlers live - and those around Hebron would divide a Palestinian state into three separate areas or "cantons".

[...]

The continued building of Jewish homes in the West Bank is a major obstacle to a renewed peace process. According to the Israeli human rights group, Peace Now, some 60 outposts, some of them uninhabited, have been established since Mr Sharon came to power. So far, Mr Sharon has said he will dismantle some settlements that are seen as illegal under Israeli law - this will apply mostly to such outposts. Jewish settlements, themselves, contravene international humanitarian law, which prohibits an occupying power transferring citizens from its own territory to occupied territory. (This is laid down in the Fourth Geneva Convention, article 49). According to the Israeli human rights group B'tselem, Israeli governments over the past 20 years have used a complex legal and bureaucratic mechanism to take control of more than 50% of the land in the West Bank. This has been used to either establish settlements or create reserves of land for future settlement expansion.
It is very obvious that these settlers and the settlements themselves are cutting up the West Bank and continuing the policy of creating bantustans out of West Bank towns.


Now you're wondering why the Palestinians protest and attack with such sheer brutality. If it's anyone who does not want peace, it's not Palestine, but Israel. Israel's sponsorship for these settlers and the settler violence and harrassment that goes on almost daily in places like Hebron are inexcusable and indefensible. The Israeli Army barely tries to stop them. These videos are concrete proof of what the settlers are doing and are up to. Thus, the myth that the Israelis want peace has been extinguished.

Salaam, from
Saracen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What "Culture Clash"?

I hear this all the time, and yet I still have yet to not only materialistically comprehend this prospect, but to philosophically grasp it. There are so many cultures and races that dot this earth, and yet we have seen them come and go as well. But how can cultures themselves clash? To answer this question, one should take a look at the definition of culture. The word culture , from the Latin colo, -ere, with its root meaning "to cultivate", generally refers to patterns of human activity and the symbolic structures that give such activity significance. Different definitions of "culture" reflect different theoretical bases for understanding, or criteria for evaluating, human activity. Note the definition: patterns of personal activity. Patterns by themselves are immeasurable and also immaterial. However, the only material object encountered in the definition is the set of "symbolic structures" that represent these patterns and give them significance. Cult

حول قرار حماس تشكيل قوة مشتركة من الفصائل

هذا النص يتحدث عن التشقق في الحكومة الفلسطينية, وكيف استغلوا القوات الصهيونية على التفرق بين حماس ومنظمة التخريب " فتح" التي خانت الفاسطينيون لخدمة نفسها ولخدمة "إسراءيل". تأليف د. إبراهيم علوش قرار وزير داخلية السلطة الفلسطينية، القائمة على مرجعية اتفاقية أوسلو، بتشكيل قوة مشتركة من الفصائل العسكرية الفلسطينية المقاومة، وقرار محمود عباس رئيس سلطة أوسلو بشطب قرار وزير الداخلية سعيد صيام بتشكيل تلك القوة المشتركة، أثار الكثير من التكهنات واللغط حول مغزى تلك الخطوة وأبعادها. ومثل كل قرار سياسي، هناك دائماً واجهة خارجية وأجندة خفية، خاصة عندما نتعامل مع قوى قررت أن تكون جزءاً من الواقع السائد بدلاً من الانقلاب عليه. فالانضمام لركب أوسلو، على أساس مشروع "تغييره من الداخل"، يترك المرء بالضرورة أسير مساومات لا يمكن إلا أن تمس بالثوابت وبالمرجعيات التاريخية لصراعنا مع الحركة الصهيونية منذ أكثر من قرن. وبالمقابل، فإن قرار محمود عباس بشطب قرار وزير الداخلية يرتبط بدوره بحسابات التنافس الداخلي، ليس فقط على الصلاحيات، بل على كل دوره التاريخي هو وفتح. المهم، يمكن أن ت

Book Review: "The Crusade through Arab Eyes" by Amin Maalouf

The bulk of modern history regarding the Crusades has an unashamedly Western slant to it. Even a cursory search of the word "crusade" on Amazon Books reveals a plethora of books written by authors from the U.K., the U.S., and elsewhere in the Western world, but a severe (emphasis) paucity of books from a more Arab perspective. One book that stands out is Amin Maalouf's "The Crusades through Arab Eyes", a book I believe is much-needed given the overall bias inherent in the gestalt of Western history books on this topic. The gold standard for history on the Crusades is currently the "The Oxford History of the Crusades", another book I will review in the not-so-distant future (and expect comparisons to this book given that I have completed reading it). The too-long-didn't-read version of this review is the following: if you're interested in history, buy it, read it, and keep it. Nevertheless, my full review follows. For those who are un