Skip to main content

Walid Phares: CEO of Arab Neocon Bootlickers

I just watched a debate between Arab neocon and "terrorism 'expert'", Walid Phares, and the editor in chief of Al Quds newspaper, Abdul Bari' Atwan, on Al Jazeera's Al Ittijah il Mu'aakis (Opposing Directions). The debate was about terrorism and journalism, as well as "free speech", a hot topic these days. As soon as I get the transcript, I'll be writing about it. However, the entire debate confirmed my theory about that bald suckup: he's nothing but a simple neocon bootlicker. Yeah, I know it sounds harsh, considering that he is older than I am, but politics knows of no age, so I can bash whoever I want, even Dumbya Boosh himself.

I can't believe that Al Jazeera bothered to host the rightwing nut. He himself claimed that Al Jazeera is "jihad TV" for some reason, and asserts that it has ties with Al Qaeda. I was surprised that this was the first issue brought to the table, on the distribution of Al Qaeda tapes by Al Jazeera. CNN and other networks do so as well, so Al Jazeera is definitely no terrorist network.

Anyways, getting back to Phares, I have to hand it to him: he sure knows how to talk Arabic, though it's kind of unnerving to hear someone talk so negatively about Arabs and Islam in the Arabic language itself. Abdul Bari', however, responded quite nicely, placing a moderate view and counteracting the words that Phares kept putting into his mmouth. He was technically losing the argument before it even started, which is pretty much what Wafa' Sultan and this Syrian diplomat living in the U.S. (in another show, but I'm still looking for the transcript) do when they find themselves losing ground.

I'll just highlight one of his main arguments. Abdul Bari' claimed that he, like other journalists around the Arab world, condemn the routine abuse and killings done against journalists who make themselves known for standing up against corruption, etc. However, Phares, being the asshole that he is, asked Abdul Bari' who killed those journalists, and suggested at the same time inquisitively that the CIA killed these journalists, hence putting a load of bullshit into Abdul Bari's mouth. Abdul Bari' then responded, calmly, by saying that he doesn't know who killed them, but was opposed nevertheless to those who killed them, "even if it were my father".

However, my favorite argument, in which Abdul Bari' handed Phares's cojones back to him on a silver platter, was when they brought about the issue of "free speech" and the jailed journalist, Taysir Alluni, who was arrested by a Spanish court while he was taking shelter in the nation he and his family dwell in (Spain, duh). Abdul Bari' argues that the first course of action the Americans took while securing Baghdad and "spreading freedom and democracy" was forcing the closure of the Al Jazeera office in Baghdad. Walid Phares, with his sleazy, smiley attitude, couldn't rebut that, but he rebutted the issue of Taysir Alluni with the notion that he is being tried by the court of law... wait. When journalists in Egypt and Saudi Arabia who voice for the neocons are being shut up, the issue is "free speech", but when an Arab journalist is being imprisoned under no clear charges, it's a "court of law" thing... Ok, I get it. I get the double-standards now. Thanks a lot, Phares. I never knew you were such a hypocrite, but thanks for telling me anyways. I know better now.

Phares-boy wasn't able to rebut the fact that Arab journalists in Britian are being screened to the photo in Britian, considering his relative self-hating and anti-Islamic stance (I know he's not a Muslim, but he is no friend of any Arabs). The debate ended with Phares making a final smart-aleck comment that didn't deserve to be rebutted, because it was simple rhetoric for "freedom" and whatnot.

By the way, Phares is the member of a public relations firm known as Benador Associates, which also has an impressive neocon clientele, wielding birds of his feather like Amir Taheri, Richard Perle, Alexander Haig Jr., and Hassan Mneimneh. Phares talks about counter-terrorism to mask his utter anti-Islamic stance, and speaks of a strong association between Al Qaida and Arab governments, which of course was never the case. Personally, I wanted to go on TV and hand him back his ass and throw him out the window for the nonsense that he says, but hey, it's a free world, right?

God bless, and remember that idiots deserve the short end of the stick.

Salaam, from
Saracen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What "Culture Clash"?

I hear this all the time, and yet I still have yet to not only materialistically comprehend this prospect, but to philosophically grasp it. There are so many cultures and races that dot this earth, and yet we have seen them come and go as well. But how can cultures themselves clash? To answer this question, one should take a look at the definition of culture. The word culture , from the Latin colo, -ere, with its root meaning "to cultivate", generally refers to patterns of human activity and the symbolic structures that give such activity significance. Different definitions of "culture" reflect different theoretical bases for understanding, or criteria for evaluating, human activity. Note the definition: patterns of personal activity. Patterns by themselves are immeasurable and also immaterial. However, the only material object encountered in the definition is the set of "symbolic structures" that represent these patterns and give them significance. Cult

حول قرار حماس تشكيل قوة مشتركة من الفصائل

هذا النص يتحدث عن التشقق في الحكومة الفلسطينية, وكيف استغلوا القوات الصهيونية على التفرق بين حماس ومنظمة التخريب " فتح" التي خانت الفاسطينيون لخدمة نفسها ولخدمة "إسراءيل". تأليف د. إبراهيم علوش قرار وزير داخلية السلطة الفلسطينية، القائمة على مرجعية اتفاقية أوسلو، بتشكيل قوة مشتركة من الفصائل العسكرية الفلسطينية المقاومة، وقرار محمود عباس رئيس سلطة أوسلو بشطب قرار وزير الداخلية سعيد صيام بتشكيل تلك القوة المشتركة، أثار الكثير من التكهنات واللغط حول مغزى تلك الخطوة وأبعادها. ومثل كل قرار سياسي، هناك دائماً واجهة خارجية وأجندة خفية، خاصة عندما نتعامل مع قوى قررت أن تكون جزءاً من الواقع السائد بدلاً من الانقلاب عليه. فالانضمام لركب أوسلو، على أساس مشروع "تغييره من الداخل"، يترك المرء بالضرورة أسير مساومات لا يمكن إلا أن تمس بالثوابت وبالمرجعيات التاريخية لصراعنا مع الحركة الصهيونية منذ أكثر من قرن. وبالمقابل، فإن قرار محمود عباس بشطب قرار وزير الداخلية يرتبط بدوره بحسابات التنافس الداخلي، ليس فقط على الصلاحيات، بل على كل دوره التاريخي هو وفتح. المهم، يمكن أن ت

Book Review: "The Crusade through Arab Eyes" by Amin Maalouf

The bulk of modern history regarding the Crusades has an unashamedly Western slant to it. Even a cursory search of the word "crusade" on Amazon Books reveals a plethora of books written by authors from the U.K., the U.S., and elsewhere in the Western world, but a severe (emphasis) paucity of books from a more Arab perspective. One book that stands out is Amin Maalouf's "The Crusades through Arab Eyes", a book I believe is much-needed given the overall bias inherent in the gestalt of Western history books on this topic. The gold standard for history on the Crusades is currently the "The Oxford History of the Crusades", another book I will review in the not-so-distant future (and expect comparisons to this book given that I have completed reading it). The too-long-didn't-read version of this review is the following: if you're interested in history, buy it, read it, and keep it. Nevertheless, my full review follows. For those who are un