Skip to main content

Thoughts on the World Cup

I know I wrote a post about the world cup regarding the political presense there, but I decided to write up a personal post on the issue to make up for it.

The World Cup has proven to be one of the most exciting sports events ever to be conceived, even more than the Olympic games themselves. Every match is a tale of action, drama, suspense, fear and triumph after hard (foot)work and team coordination. Right now, as of today, we will be witnessing the final 16 compete for the final spot in mid-July.

From the beginning of the World Cup, I was supportive of Italy and Tunisia to make it to the second round. Tunisia is an Arab team, and moreover, they've got classy players like Jaidi, Chedli, Trabelsi and now Jaziri. Their tie with Saudi Arabia was unexpected, though: their level of playing is much higher. When they played against Spain, I was jumping with joy after the first half ended, with their 1-0 lead on the Matadors. The Carthage Eagles (Tunisia) lost 3-1 in that match, though they did fare better than Ukraine's 4-0 loss to Spain. Sadly, they were given the boot in their 1-0 loss to Ukraine.

Italy... Italy... Italy... What can I say about this team? Apart from having players from some of the best clubs and the best European league, the Italian league (in my opinion, though many might disagree with me), Italy has a record of winning 3 World Cups and have made it to many finals. Plus, my third language is Italian. Although they played poorly against the U.S., the Squaddra Azura made a mark for themselves against Ghana and the Czech Republic. I wish them the best in the second round.

There are other teams worthy of mention. Germany made a name for themselves by winning every group match, as did Portugal, Spain and Brazil. However, a handful of surprises were in store, among them Ecuador, Ghana, Ukraine and Australia; all four have made it to the second round for the first time in World Cup history, with first-timers Ghana and Ukraine being the most prominent of the four. Two teams, however, went down and out in style, such as Ivory Coast and the Czech Republic.

I was happy that France made it through yesterday, as Zidane is playing his last football tournament before retiring forever from football as a whole. Other players like Figo and Raul are contemplating the same path. However, Sami Al Jaber and Hussein Abdl-Ghani Suleimani of Saudi Arabia have also said goodbye to international football. Who knows who else is planning to depart?

I'm not the ranting type when it comes to talking about World Cup matches, but these are simply my thoughts.

Salaam, from
Saracen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Politics as an "Outflow of Culture": Unmasking Racism in today's Socioeconomic Scene

A common yet grave fallacy is to assume that (the actions of) (part of) the infrastructure of a particular country at a particular time and place is derived from a singular cause, of which a metaphysical nature attributed to said cause would be even more so. That said, attributing (a perception of) (failed) politics as an "outflow" of a country's culture is in my honest opinion a crock of bull. I'm not denying that culture and politics are related: there clearly is a relationship between the two in the broader historical context. However, this reductionist outlook panders to more than your garden variety racism, itself being built on misinterpretations and misunderstandings. Why is that? First of all, consider that politics and culture are mutually exclusive concepts, although their definitions may not appear to be so on the surface. Politics (according to the pseudo-omniscient Wikipedia [1] ) is a process by which groups of people make collective decisions. The...

Book Review: "The Third Chimpanzee" by Jared Diamond

Jared Diamond is sort of a rock star in the sphere of biogeography (and science in general depending on your perspective). He is more a doom-sayer than a soothe-sayer, a prophet warning of the destruction of society and mankind as a whole. His magnum opus and prophetic text " Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies" has received accolades from a variety of sources, the least of which was the Pulitzer Prize in 1998. Having read that book myself, I came into his lesser-known essay " The Third Chimpanzee " with the expectation that it would be entertaining and enlightening at the same time. Gladly, I was not disappointed, but a glaring issue exists that I will address later. The first book published by Jared Diamond, " The Third Chimpanzee " explores the progression of human evolution in four parts. In the first, he explores the biological premises of our relationship to two other primate species, the common and pygmy chimpanzees (now c...

On "Leviathan", by Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury (Part 1: On Man)

Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan , or The Matter, Forme, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil,  is a veritable juggernaut (pun intended) of a book. It is Hobbes' magnum opus, having been circulated widely by the turn of the 17th and 18th Centuries at a time when England was plunged into civil war. Rather than rebel against the new political order (a war crime according to Hobbes which I will revisit later in this post), Hobbes' central thesis is to submit to the absolute authority of an established commonwealth (preferably, in Hobbes' point of view, a "Christian" one), which he compares to the overwhelming biblical sea monster, the Leviathan. Having just finished reading it, I would like to convey my thoughts on his central themes in as short a post as allowed by the breadth of the knowledge he passed on with this read. For this post, I will stick to part 1 (On Man), and deal with the subsequent parts of the book in later posts. Summary of P...