Skip to main content

Why I Hate Rush Limbaugh

There are many political commentators out there, and many of them are big names: Noam Chomsky, William Blum, Bill O'Reilly, Chris Matthews and others. However, one name is well-known here in the MidEast, and when it's heard, it is reviled with absolute disgust. Liberals everywhere detest this name because of the political bullshit that is associated with it.

That name is Rush Limbaugh, known for his rants on all sorts of issues. He's technically a neo-conservative, but that's not what really damns him. What really does is his nature and his commentary. Rush Limbaugh has a reputation as an anti-Arab racist. One of his most famous outbursts was on Abu Ghraib. Kurt Nimmo documented this show, quoting Rush Limbaugh, who loudmouthed,
"I'm talking about people having a good time, these people [CIA agents and MPs at Abu Ghraib], you ever heard of emotional release? You heard of need to blow some steam off? ... This is no different than what happens at the Skull and Bones initiation and we're going to ruin people's lives over it and we're going to hamper our military effort, and then we are going to really hammer them because they had a good time."
What strikes me in this is his negligence for human life and human rights. He continues to quote Limbaugh, who argues that Arab prisoners should be humiliated, saying,
"It could well be that the whole purpose here, which has been said, was to humiliate these prisoners. And there's no better way of doing it than what was done. These are Arab males -- what better way to humiliate them than to have a woman have authority over them? What's the purpose here? What's the objective of this? The objective is to soften them up for interrogation later, later on. As I said, there was no horror, there was no terror there was no death, there was no injuries, nothing."
Nimmo rebuts with,
Never mind that people were killed -- and photographed by Limbaugh's centerfold, Spec. Sabrina D. Harman. The point Rush is making is that Arabs are untermenschen, sub-humans, and they do not experience horror and injury the same way Americans do. It's okay to saddle up a 70 year old Iraqi woman with a harness and ride her around like a donkey because Arabs are immune to terror and abuse.
I think I made my point on how Rush Limbaugh is indeed anti-Arab... he and his fellow neocons, that is. The idea is that such people like Limbaugh tend to join the de-humanization campaign and spew out rhetoric that associates Arabs with terrorists, and thus degrading their human and civilian status. Go back to my long rant on the torture in Iraq. Seriously, such things piss me off. People like Limbaugh are giving America a bad image (not that it doesn't have one already).

Unsurprisingly, his hate-mongering rhetoric, paralleled with the likes of Ann Coulter, Jerry Fallwell and Pat Robertson (evangelicals who deserve the title "America's Taliban"), still roams over the airwaves in the North American continent. He spoke quite a lot on the UAE port deal issue, which, along with the immigration debate and Hurricane Katrina, brought about the worst of American racism and white Christian neoconservative nationalism... and the whole world saw it with their own eyes. He speaks as if he's got a balloon in his stomach ready to explode with BS. Sure, he may have once said that he only states opinions and that he finds it "surprising" that he "gets attacked". He's always got that "whoooaaaa" kind of attitude that makes you feel sick to the stomach, and his commentary is extremely talkative that the BS filter in your brain fills up before you can say "I love Bush".

What I don't understand is how many Americans deal with him being around. But hey, it's a free country, right? He can talk all he wants, and I have the right to criticize his BS... but anywho...

Lately, though, he was arrested and fined for abusing drugs, specifically pain medication and whatnot. What makes it ironic is that he was a vehement opponent to all sorts of drugs and thus a fanatical supporter of the "war on drugs" that Dubya Bush is carrying out. So, you could say that he typifies governmental double standards. Now, while I am not all for homosexual rights (I am not a supporter nor an opponent), I find it sick that he attacks all sorts of minorities as well on these issues. Am I the only one who wants to punch him up his big, fat head?

Almost every single liberal out there, including myself, felt a bit of relief that the right-wing pundits got his yapper shut up for a while, but I sure do hope he gets the slammer!

Bill O'Reilly, Pat Robertson, Jerry Fallwell, David Horowitz, Ann Coulter... YOU'RE ALL NEXT!!!

Salaam, from
Saracen

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What "Culture Clash"?

I hear this all the time, and yet I still have yet to not only materialistically comprehend this prospect, but to philosophically grasp it. There are so many cultures and races that dot this earth, and yet we have seen them come and go as well. But how can cultures themselves clash? To answer this question, one should take a look at the definition of culture. The word culture , from the Latin colo, -ere, with its root meaning "to cultivate", generally refers to patterns of human activity and the symbolic structures that give such activity significance. Different definitions of "culture" reflect different theoretical bases for understanding, or criteria for evaluating, human activity. Note the definition: patterns of personal activity. Patterns by themselves are immeasurable and also immaterial. However, the only material object encountered in the definition is the set of "symbolic structures" that represent these patterns and give them significance. Cult

حول قرار حماس تشكيل قوة مشتركة من الفصائل

هذا النص يتحدث عن التشقق في الحكومة الفلسطينية, وكيف استغلوا القوات الصهيونية على التفرق بين حماس ومنظمة التخريب " فتح" التي خانت الفاسطينيون لخدمة نفسها ولخدمة "إسراءيل". تأليف د. إبراهيم علوش قرار وزير داخلية السلطة الفلسطينية، القائمة على مرجعية اتفاقية أوسلو، بتشكيل قوة مشتركة من الفصائل العسكرية الفلسطينية المقاومة، وقرار محمود عباس رئيس سلطة أوسلو بشطب قرار وزير الداخلية سعيد صيام بتشكيل تلك القوة المشتركة، أثار الكثير من التكهنات واللغط حول مغزى تلك الخطوة وأبعادها. ومثل كل قرار سياسي، هناك دائماً واجهة خارجية وأجندة خفية، خاصة عندما نتعامل مع قوى قررت أن تكون جزءاً من الواقع السائد بدلاً من الانقلاب عليه. فالانضمام لركب أوسلو، على أساس مشروع "تغييره من الداخل"، يترك المرء بالضرورة أسير مساومات لا يمكن إلا أن تمس بالثوابت وبالمرجعيات التاريخية لصراعنا مع الحركة الصهيونية منذ أكثر من قرن. وبالمقابل، فإن قرار محمود عباس بشطب قرار وزير الداخلية يرتبط بدوره بحسابات التنافس الداخلي، ليس فقط على الصلاحيات، بل على كل دوره التاريخي هو وفتح. المهم، يمكن أن ت

Book Review: "The Crusade through Arab Eyes" by Amin Maalouf

The bulk of modern history regarding the Crusades has an unashamedly Western slant to it. Even a cursory search of the word "crusade" on Amazon Books reveals a plethora of books written by authors from the U.K., the U.S., and elsewhere in the Western world, but a severe (emphasis) paucity of books from a more Arab perspective. One book that stands out is Amin Maalouf's "The Crusades through Arab Eyes", a book I believe is much-needed given the overall bias inherent in the gestalt of Western history books on this topic. The gold standard for history on the Crusades is currently the "The Oxford History of the Crusades", another book I will review in the not-so-distant future (and expect comparisons to this book given that I have completed reading it). The too-long-didn't-read version of this review is the following: if you're interested in history, buy it, read it, and keep it. Nevertheless, my full review follows. For those who are un